Cited by 124Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesSodium Intake and HealthCardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention

Progression Is Accelerated From Prehypertension to Hypertension in Blacks

Open access
Selassie, Anbesaw, Wagner, C. Shaun, Laken, Marilyn L., Ferguson, M. LaFrance, Ferdinand, Keith C., Egan, Brent M.·2011·Hypertension

Abstract

Prehypertension is a major risk factor for hypertension. Blacks have more prevalent and severe hypertension than whites, but it is unknown whether progression from prehypertension is accelerated in blacks. We examined this question in a prospective cohort study of 18 865 nonhypertensive persons (5733 black [30.4%] and 13 132 white [69.6%]) aged 18 to 85 years. Electronic health record data were obtained from 197 community-based outpatient clinics in the Southeast United States. Days elapsing from study entry to hypertension diagnosis, mainly blood pressure ≥140 mm Hg systolic and/or ≥90 mm Hg diastolic on 2 consecutive visits established conversion time within a maximum observation period of 2550 days. Cox regression modeling was used to examine conversion to hypertension as a function of race, while controlling for age, sex, baseline systolic and diastolic blood pressures, body mass index, diabetes mellitus, and chronic kidney disease. The covariable adjusted median conversion time when 50% became hypertensive was 365 days earlier for blacks than whites (626 versus 991 days; P <0.001). Among covariables, baseline systolic blood pressure 130 to 139 mm Hg (hazard ratio: 1.77 [95% CI: 1.69 to 1.86]) and 120 to 129 mm Hg (hazard ratio: 1.52 [95% CI: 1.44 to 1.60]), as well as age ≥75 years (hazard ratio: 1.40 [95% CI: 1.29 to 1.51]) and 55 to 74 years (hazard ratio: 1.29 [95% CI: 1.23 to 1.35]) were the strongest predictors of hypertension. Additional predictors included age 35 to 54 years, diastolic blood pressure 80 to 89 mm Hg, overweight and obesity, and diabetes mellitus (all P <0.001). Conversion from prehypertension to hypertension is accelerated in blacks, which suggests that effective interventions in prehypertension could reduce racial disparities in prevalent hypertension.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/hypertensionaha.111.177410

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Excess adiposity is the strongest known risk factor for hypertension in male and female subjects of different ages and races.

    “The close relationship between excess adipose mass and hypertension is well documented, with population-based studies showing excess adiposity as the strongest known risk factor for hypertension in male and female subjects of different ages and races (1–5).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [22]Breslow NE Day NE Modelling the relaionship between risk, dose, and time International Agency for Research on Cancer Statistical Method In Cancer Research: The Design and Analysis of Cohort Data Lyon, France Oxford University Press 1987 232 70
  2. [23]Greenland S Applications of Stratified Analysis Methods Rothman KJ G S L T Modern Epidemiology 3rd Philadelphia, USA Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2008 283 302
  3. [24]Egan BM Should metabolic syndrome patients with prehypertension receive antihypertensive therapy? Bakris G Oxford, UK Clinical Publishing 2006 9 25

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Selassie, A., Wagner, C. S., Laken, M. L., Ferguson, M. L., Ferdinand, K. C., & Egan, B. M.
Affiliations
Emory University (US)
Venue
Hypertension
Published
2011-10
Volume
58
Issue
4
Pages
579-587
ISSN
  • 0194-911X (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4563
OpenAlex
W2135286363
Cited by
124
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 10
FWCI
6.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Hypertension (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL091841, HL091841)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK067615, DK067615)
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR029882)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Sodium Intake and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
Keywords
prehypertension, racial disparities, African Americans, blood pressure, hypertension progression, baseline systolic blood pressure, age, obesity, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, body mass index
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Black or African American, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Southeastern United States, Cohort Studies, Prevalence, Disease Progression, Black People, White People, Diabetes Complications, Overweight, Young Adult, Prehypertension

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review