CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 143Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesCardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionSodium Intake and Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Office, Home, and Ambulatory Blood Pressures as Predictors of Cardiovascular Risk

Niiranen, Teemu J., Mäki, Juhani, Puukka, Pauli, Karanko, Hannu, Jula, Antti M.·2014·Hypertension
DOI 10.1161/hypertensionaha.114.03292
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Ambulatory blood pressure (BP) is considered as the gold standard of BP measurement although it has not been shown to be more strongly associated with cardiovascular risk than is home BP. Our objective was to compare the prognostic value of office, home, and ambulatory BP for cardiovascular risk in 502 participants examined in 1992 to 1996. The end point was a composite of cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure hospitalization, and coronary intervention. We assessed the prognostic value of each BP in multivariable-adjusted Cox models. The likelihood χ2 ratio value was used to test whether the addition of a BP variable improved the model’s goodness of fit. After a follow-up of 16.1±3.9 years, 70 participants (13.9%) had experienced ≥1 cardiovascular event. Office (systolic/diastolic hazard ratio per 1/1 mm Hg increase in BP, 1.024/1.018; systolic/diastolic 95% confidence interval, 1.009–1.040/0.994–1.043), home (hazard ratio, 1.029/1.028; 95% confidence interval, 1.013–1.045/1.005–1.052), and 24-hour ambulatory BP (hazard ratio, 1.033/1.049; 95% confidence interval, 1.019–1.047/1.023–1.077) were predictive of cardiovascular events. When all 3 BP variables were included in the model simultaneously, only systolic/diastolic ambulatory BP was a significant predictor of cardiovascular events (P=0.002/<0.001). Home systolic/diastolic BP improved the fit of the model only marginally when added to a model including office BP (χ2=3.0/4.0, P=0.09/0.047). Ambulatory BP, however, improved the fit of model more clearly when added to office and home BP (χ2=9.0/12.3, P=0.001/<0.001). Our findings suggest that ambulatory BP is prognostically superior to office and home BP.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/hypertensionaha.114.03292

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 31 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–143 of 143

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Niiranen, T. J., Mäki, J., Puukka, P., Karanko, H., & Jula, A. M.
Affiliations
Turku University Hospital (FI)
ORCID
Venue
Hypertension
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Published
2014-08
Volume
64
Issue
2
Pages
281-286
ISSN
  • 0194-911X (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4563
DOI
10.1161/hypertensionaha.114.03292
OpenAlex
W2129391087
Cited by
143
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 5
FWCI
10.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Hypertension (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • STM:n Hallinnonalan avoin julkaisuarkisto (Julkari) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Sodium Intake and Health
Keywords
home blood pressure, office blood pressure, cardiovascular risk, cardiovascular events, prognostic value, cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure hospitalization, coronary intervention
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Pressure, Blood Pressure Determination, Cardiovascular Diseases, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review