Cited by 15Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesNitric Oxide and Endothelin EffectsChronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes

Increase in Bioavailability of Nitric Oxide After Renal Denervation Improves Kidney Function in Sheep With Hypertensive Kidney Disease

Open access
Singh, Reetu R., McArdle, Zoe M., Booth, Lindsea C., May, Clive N., Head, Geoff A., Moritz, Karen M., Schlaich, Markus P., Denton, Kate M.·2021·Hypertension

Abstract

Overactivity of renal sympathetic nerves and nitric oxide (NO) deficiency occur in hypertensive chronic kidney disease (CKD). In sheep with hypertensive CKD and NO deficiency, renal denervation (RDN) reduces blood pressure and improves kidney function (glomerular filtration rate). We hypothesized that this improvement in glomerular filtration rate after RDN is associated with increased NO bioavailability. In this study, glomerular filtration rate response to systemic inhibition of NOS (NO synthase) was examined in healthy and CKD sheep at 2 and 30 months after a sham (intact nerves) or RDN procedure. Basal urinary total nitrate (nitrate+nitrite) excretion was examined at 2 and 30 months, and kidney protein expression of endothelial and neuronal NOS was assessed at 30 months. Urinary nitrate+nitrite in CKD-RDN and healthy sheep was ≈50% to 70% greater than in CKD-intact. During NOS inhibition, the fall in glomerular filtration rate in CKD-RDN sheep was ≈20% greater than in CKD-intact. These effects in CKD-RDN sheep were similar to those in healthy sheep. Endothelial NOS protein expression was lower in CKD-intact sheep compared with healthy sheep and compared with CKD-RDN. In summary, RDN normalizes NO bioavailability and restores contribution of NO to renal hemodynamics in CKD. These changes may promote improvements in kidney function and sustained blood pressure lowering after RDN in hypertensive CKD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/hypertensionaha.120.16718

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Preclinical studies in sheep and rat models show that renal denervation improves renal function and reduces blood pressure in chronic kidney disease, with effects beyond blood pressure reduction.

    “However, the beneficial effects of RDN on CKD are not limited to its antihypertensive effects, with studies showing direct improvement in renal function following ablation of the renal nerves.”

    From Renal nerves in physiology, pathophysiology and interoception (2025) · cites this paper as [110]

    The Basal Cardiovascular and Renal Function results report lower blood pressure and, at 30 months, higher renal blood flow and glomerular filtration rate after denervation in sheep with CKD. The Discussion links improved renal hemodynamics to nitric oxide, supporting a renal effect beyond simply reporting blood-pressure reduction. This paper does not report a rat experiment showing improved renal function, nor does it establish that the kidney-function improvement is independent of blood-pressure lowering. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Singh, R. R., McArdle, Z. M., Booth, L. C., May, C. N., Head, G. A., Moritz, K. M., Schlaich, M. P., & Denton, K. M.
Affiliations
  • Monash University (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Australia (G.A.H., M.P.S.)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute (AU)
Venue
Hypertension
Published
2021-04
Volume
77
Issue
4
Pages
1299-1310
ISSN
  • 0194-911X (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4563
OpenAlex
W3134306672
Cited by
15
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2
FWCI
1.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Hypertension (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
Keywords
renal denervation, nitric oxide bioavailability, glomerular filtration rate, nitric oxide synthase inhibition, endothelial nitric oxide synthase, neuronal nitric oxide synthase, renal hemodynamics, sheep model
MeSH terms
Animals, Blood Pressure, Hypertension, Renal, Kidney, Kidney Function Tests, Nephritis, Nitric Oxide, Sheep, Sympathectomy, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review