Cited by 60Physical Activity and HealthCardiovascular and exercise physiologyAcute Ischemic Stroke Management

Reduction in Incident Stroke Risk With Vigorous Physical Activity: Evidence From 7.7-Year Follow-Up of the National Runners’ Health Study

Open access
Williams, Paul T.·2009·Stroke

Abstract

Background and Purpose— The purpose of this study was to assess the dose–response relationship between vigorous physical activity (running distance, km/d) and the participant-reported physician-diagnosed stroke. Methods— Age-adjusted survival analysis of 29 279 men and 12 123 women followed prospectively for 7.7 years. Results— One hundred men and 19 women reported incident strokes. Per km/d run, the age- and smoking-adjusted risk for stroke decreased 12% in men ( P =0.0007), and 11% in men and women combined ( P =0.001), which remained significant when further adjusted for baseline diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, and BMI (8% and 7% reduction per km/d run, respectively, P =0.03). Men and women who ran ≥2 km/d (ie, exceeded the recommended AHA/CDC and NIH guideline activity level) had significantly lower risk than those who ran less ( P =0.05), and those who ran ≥4 km/d had significantly lower risk than those who ran 2 to 3.9 km/d ( P =0.02). Men and women who ran ≥8 km/d were at 60% lower risk than those who ran <2 km/d ( P =0.002). Conclusions— The risk for incident stroke is substantially reduced in those who exceed the guideline physical activity level, which cannot be attributed to less hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, or body weight.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/strokeaha.108.535427

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Thirteen included papers included women only, and no included studies included only men.

    “Thirteen papers included women only,53–65 and no studies included only men.”

    From Sex Differences in Physical Activity and Incident Stroke: A Systematic Review (2022) · cites this paper as [59]

    The Methods passage describes a cohort of 29,272 men and 12,123 women, so this cited paper is not a women-only study. This paper alone cannot establish whether any other studies included only men. (LLM, conf=0.91)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Williams, P. T.
Affiliations
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Williams, Paul T.
Venue
Stroke
Published
2009-05
Volume
40
Issue
5
Pages
1921-1923
ISSN
  • 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4628
OpenAlex
W2088725941
Cited by
60
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Stroke (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • American Heart Association
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging (R03AG032004, AG 032004)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK 066738, R01DK066738)
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Keywords
high-intensity exercise, running distance, dose-response relationship, physical activity guidelines, cardiovascular risk factors, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia, body mass index
MeSH terms
Adult, Body Weight, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Physical Fitness, Risk Factors, Running, Body Mass Index, Proportional Hazards Models, Survival Analysis, Risk Assessment, Stroke, Risk Reduction Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review