Cited by 173Cerebrovascular and genetic disordersBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Blood Pressure and White-Matter Disease Progression in a Biethnic Cohort: Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study

Open access
Gottesman, Rebecca F., Coresh, Josef, Catellier, Diane J., Sharrett, A. Richey, Rose, Kathryn M., Coker, Laura H., Shibata, Dean K., Knopman, David S. +2 more·2010·Stroke

Abstract

Background and Purpose— Blood pressure (BP) is a predictor of concurrent and subsequently measured white-matter hyperintensity (WMH), but longitudinal studies of WMH changes and data in black participants are lacking. We hypothesized that WMH progression would be (1) strongly related to BP in blacks and whites and (2) predicted more strongly by earlier (midlife) or cumulative BP measurements than by measures at older ages. Methods— Participants were 983 individuals (49% black) from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study who underwent cerebral magnetic resonance imaging in 1993–1995 and 2004–2006. Associations between BP (measured at each of 5 visits, in addition to a time-averaged cumulative BP) and progression of WMHs were analyzed and compared. Results— Cumulative systolic BP (SBP) was the strongest BP predictor of WMH progression in adjusted models. Higher cumulative SBP (by 20 mm Hg) was associated with greater progression of WMHs and was similar in blacks (2.5 cm 3 , P <0.0001) and whites (2.6 cm 3 , P <0.0001). Higher cumulative SBP (per 20 mm Hg) was also associated with being in the top quintile of WMH progression (adjusted odds ratio=2.0; 95% CI, 1.6 to 2.6). Earlier SBP measurements were stronger predictors of WMH progression than were later SBP measurements, but in blacks only. Conclusions— In this population-based cohort, cumulative SBP was a stronger predictor of WMH progression than SBP from individual visits, in both blacks and whites. Earlier BPs were stronger predictors than BPs measured at later time points in blacks only.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/strokeaha.109.566992

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gottesman, R. F., Coresh, J., Catellier, D. J., Sharrett, A. R., Rose, K. M., Coker, L. H., Shibata, D. K., Knopman, D. S., Jack, C. R., & Mosley, T. H.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Venue
Stroke
Published
2010-01
Volume
41
Issue
1
Pages
3-8
ISSN
  • 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4628
OpenAlex
W1976312033
Cited by
173
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Stroke (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (n01hc55021-47-0-1, n01hc55020-39-0-0, n01hc55016-37-0-0, n01hc055022-024, n01hc55019-35-0-1, n01hc55018-38-0-1, n01hc55015-48-0-1)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (N01-HC55022, N01 HC055016, R01 HL70825, N01-HC-55018, N01 HC 55020, N01 HC 55019, N01 HC055020, N01 HC055018, ­N01-HC55016, N01 HC055022, N01 HC055019, R01HL070825, N01‐HC‐55015, N01-HC55021, N01 HC055021, N01 HC055015)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Cerebrovascular and genetic disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
blood pressure, white matter hyperintensities, midlife blood pressure, racial differences, Black participants, cerebral small vessel disease, Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study
MeSH terms
Aged, Blood Pressure, Ethnicity, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Nerve Fibers, Myelinated, Prospective Studies, Residence Characteristics, Risk Factors, Cohort Studies, Disease Progression, Black People, White People, Leukoaraiosis, Atherosclerosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review