The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Incidence of Cerebral Microbleeds in the General Population: The Rotterdam Scan Study
Open accessAbstract
Background and Purpose—: Cerebral microbleeds are frequently seen in the general elderly population, but it is unknown at what rate they occur with aging and whether once present can disappear over time. Methods—: As part of the Rotterdam Scan Study, 831 persons (mean age, 68.5 years) underwent repeated brain MRI with a mean interval of 3.4 years. We assessed determinants of incident microbleeds in relation to their location with multiple logistic regressions. Results—: Overall prevalence of microbleeds increased from 24.4% at baseline to 28.0% at follow-up. Eighty-five persons (10.2%) developed new microbleeds. Microbleeds at baseline predicted development of new microbleeds (OR, 5.38; 95% CI, 3.34 to 8.67). In only 6 persons with microbleeds at baseline, fewer microbleeds were present at the follow-up examination. Cardiovascular risk factors, presence of lacunar infarcts, and larger white matter lesion volume at baseline were all associated with incident deep or infratentorial microbleeds, whereas people with the apolipoprotein E ϵ4/ϵ4 genotype or larger white matter lesion volume had a higher risk of incident strictly lobar microbleeds. Conclusions—: Incidence of microbleeds in the general population over a 3-year interval was substantial and microbleeds rarely disappeared. Risk factors for incident microbleeds were similar to those for prevalent microbleeds and differed according to microbleed location. These results support the assessment of microbleeds on T2*-weighted MRI as a possible marker of both cerebral amyloid angiopathy and hypertensive vasculopathy progression.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cerebral microbleeds: a guide to detection and interpretation
Greenberg, S. M., Vernooij, M. W., Cordonnier, C., Viswanathan, A., Al-Shahi Salman, R., Warach, S., Launer, L. J., Van Buchem, M. A., & Breteler, M. M. (2009) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(09)70013-4 · Cited by 1,798
Self-citationβ-Amyloid-mediated vasoactivity and vascular endothelial damage
Thomas, T., Thomas, G., McLendon, C., Sutton, T., & Mullan, M. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/380168a0 · Cited by 703
Jeerakathil, T., Wolf, P. A., Beiser, A., Hald, J. K., Au, R., Kase, C. S., Massaro, J. M., & DeCarli, C. (2004) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.0000131809.35202.1b · Cited by 319
Serial Susceptibility Weighted MRI Measures Brain Iron and Microbleeds in Dementia
Kirsch, W., McAuley, G., Holshouser, B., Petersen, F., Ayaz, M., Vinters, H. V., Dickson, C., Haacke, E. M., Britt III, W., Larsen, J., et al. (2009) · Journal of Alzheimer's Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-2009-1073 · Cited by 139
Liem, M. K., Lesnik Oberstein, S. A. J., Haan, J., van der Neut, I. L., van den Boom, R., Ferrari, M. D., van Buchem, M. A., & van der Grond, J. (2008) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2492080357 · Cited by 40
Cited by
Toth, P., Tarantini, S., Csiszar, A., & Ungvari, Z. (2017) · American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00581.2016 · Cited by 522
Sperling, R., Salloway, S., Brooks, D. J., Tampieri, D., Barakos, J., Fox, N. C., Raskind, M., Sabbagh, M., Honig, L. S., Porsteinsson, A. P., et al. (2012) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(12)70015-7 · Cited by 512
Cerebral Microbleeds: Imaging and Clinical Significance
Haller, S., Vernooij, M. W., Kuijer, J. P. A., Larsson, E.-M., Jäger, H. R., & Barkhof, F. (2018) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2018170803 · Cited by 308
Self-citationIncidence of cerebral microbleeds in preclinical Alzheimer disease
Yates, P. A., Desmond, P. M., Phal, P. M., Steward, C., Szoeke, C., Salvado, O., Ellis, K. A., Martins, R. N., Masters, C. L., Ames, D., et al. (2014) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000000285 · Cited by 150
An algorithmic approach to structural imaging in dementia
Harper, L., Barkhof, F., Scheltens, P., Schott, J. M., & Fox, N. C. (2014) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp-2013-306285 · Cited by 137
Metadata
- Authors
- Poels, M. M. F., Ikram, M. A., van der Lugt, A., Hofman, A., Krestin, G. P., Breteler, M. M. B., & Vernooij, M. W.
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 2011-03
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 656-661
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W2113770731
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 16.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.