Cited by 109Nursing care and researchStroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryFamily Caregiving in Mental Illness

Systematic review of the evidence for stroke family caregiver and dyad interventions

Open access
Bakas, Tamilyn, McCarthy, Michael J., Miller, Elaine L.·2022·Stroke

Abstract

Stroke family caregiver and dyad literature has expanded over the past few years. The purpose of this review was to build upon 2 prior systematic reviews to critique, analyze, and synthesize the evidence pertaining to the impact of family caregiver and dyad interventions on stroke survivor and family caregiver outcomes. CINAHL, PsychINFO, PubMed, and reference lists were searched from December 1, 2016 through March 31, 2021. Using PRISMA guidelines (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses), articles were identified that tested outcomes from stroke family caregiver or dyad interventions that targeted the health or well-being of family caregivers. Data from the articles were abstracted into tables for analysis, then compared with recommendations from the 2 prior systematic reviews. A total of 18 articles met inclusion criteria (10 caregiver interventions; 8 dyad interventions) representing sample sizes ranging from 7 to 349 caregivers or dyads. Most were randomized controlled trials (n=13); 2 were cluster randomized trials; and 3 were single-group quasi-experimental designs. Of the 18 studies, 8 had <50 caregivers or dyads and 5 were small feasibility studies that reported data trends rather than testing for significance. Only 6 studies reported significant survivor outcomes. Eleven studies reported significant caregiver outcomes, the most common being burden. A number of survivor and caregiver outcomes were not significant, or only significant for certain subgroups. The limited number of studies, small sample sizes, and conflicting results, made it difficult to draw firm conclusions regarding the impact of these interventions on outcomes. Based on the available evidence from these 18 studies, recommendations from the 2 prior reviews were generally supported. Well-designed and well-powered randomized controlled clinical trials are still needed to confirm efficacy of stroke family caregiver and dyad interventions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/strokeaha.121.034090

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [33]Orlowska E, Rasmus A, Goral-Polrola J, Morga R, Pachalska M. The Long-Time Effects of Group Therapy Intervention on Marriage Communication Between Fluent and Non-Fluent Aphasic Patients and their Spouses: Who Benefits the Most? ACTA Neuropsychologica. 2018; 16: 229– 241.
  2. [42]Bakas T, Austin JK, Habermann B, Jessup NM, McLennon SM, Mitchell PH, Morrison G, Yang Z, Stump TE, Weaver MT. Telephone Assessment and Skill-Building Kit for Stroke Caregivers: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Stroke. 2015; 46: 3478– 3487. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.011099. 26549488 PMC4659731 · DOI
  3. [52]Bakas T, Commiskey P. Stroke Family Caregiving and the COVID-19 Pandemic: Impact and Future Directions. Stroke. 2021; 52: 1415– 1417. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.033525. 33588603 · DOI
  4. [53]Leira EC, Russman AN, Biller J, Brown DL, Bushnell CD, Caso V, Chamorro A, Creutzfeldt CJ, Cruz-Flores S, Elkind MSV, Preserving Stroke Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Potential Issues and Solutions. Neurology. 2020; 95: 124– 133. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000009713. 32385186 PMC7455350 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bakas, T., McCarthy, M. J., & Miller, E. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Cincinnati (US)
  • Northern Arizona University (US)
Venue
Stroke
Published
2022-06
Volume
53
Issue
6
Pages
2093-2102
ISSN
  • 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4628
OpenAlex
W4221013568
Cited by
109
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 41 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 3
FWCI
3.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Stroke (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Northern Arizona University
  • National Institute of Nursing Research (R01NR010388, K01NR008712, R21NR016992)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
Keywords
family caregivers, caregiver interventions, caregiver burden, stroke survivors, caregiver well-being, intervention efficacy
MeSH terms
Humans, Caregivers, Survivors, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review