The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
To Pool or Not to Pool: Homogeneous Versus Heterogeneous Estimators Applied to Cigarette Demand
Abstract
This paper reexamines the benefits of pooling and, in addition, contrasts the performance of newly proposed heterogeneous estimators. The analysis utilizes a panel data set from 46 American states over the period 1963 to 1992 and a dynamic demand specification for cigarettes. Also, the forecast performance of the various estimators is compared.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models
Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-d · Cited by 19,880
Specification Tests in Econometrics
Hausman, J. A. (1978) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913827 · Cited by 18,820
Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects
Nickell, S. (1981) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1911408 · Cited by 8,735
Hsiao, C. (2014) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139839327 · Cited by 7,869
Hsiao, C. (2022) · doi:10.1017/9781009057745 · Cited by 7,869
Estimating long-run relationships from dynamic heterogeneous panels
Pesaran, M. H., & Smith, R. (1995) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/0304-4076(94)01644-f · Cited by 5,479
Formulation and estimation of dynamic models using panel data
Anderson, T. W., & Hsiao, C. (1982) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/0304-4076(82)90095-1 · Cited by 2,849
Panel data and unobservable individual effects
Hausman, J., & Taylor, W. (1981) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/0304-4076(81)90085-3 · Cited by 2,309
Panel Data and Unobservable Individual Effects
Hausman, J. A., & Taylor, W. E. (1981) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1911406 · Cited by 2,258
On bias, inconsistency, and efficiency of various estimators in dynamic panel data models
Kiviet, J. F. (1995) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/0304-4076(94)01643-e · Cited by 1,926
Cited by
Baltagi, B. H. (2008) · Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1002/for.1047 · Cited by 574
Self-citationSamargandi, N., Fidrmuc, J., & Ghosh, S. (2015) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.11.010 · Cited by 647
Demographic Structure and Macroeconomic Trends
Aksoy, Y., Basso, H. S., Smith, R. P., & Grasl, T. (2019) · American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics · doi:10.1257/mac.20170114 · Cited by 267
The impact of tobacco advertising bans on consumption in developing countries
Blecher, E. (2008) · Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.02.010 · Cited by 170
Does aging influence structural change? Evidence from panel data
Siliverstovs, B., Kholodilin, K. A., & Thiessen, U. (2011) · Economic Systems · doi:10.1016/j.ecosys.2010.05.004 · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- Baltagi, B. H., Griffin, J. M., & Xiong, W.
- Venue
- Review of Economics and Statistics
- Publisher
- MIT Press - Journals
- Published
- 2000-02
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 117-126
- ISSN
- 0034-6535 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-9142
- OpenAlex
- W2154482357
- Cited by
- 331
- References
- 31
- FWCI
- 10.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: To Pool or Not to Pool: Homogeneous Versus Heterogeneous Estimators Applied to Cigarette Demand. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1162/003465300558551
- The paper
- Baltagi, B. H., Griffin, J. M., & Xiong, W. (2000). To Pool or Not to Pool: Homogeneous Versus Heterogeneous Estimators Applied to Cigarette Demand. Review of Economics and Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465300558551
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
