The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
I. The Neurocognitive Profile of Williams Syndrome: A Complex Pattern of Strengths and Weaknesses
Abstract
The rare, genetically based disorder, Williams syndrome (WMS), produces a constellation of distinctive cognitive, neuroanatomical, and electrophysiological features which we explore through the series of studies reported here. In this paper, we focus primarily on the cognitive characteristics of WMS and begin to forge links among these characteristics, the brain, and the genetic basis of the disorder. The distinctive cognitive profile of individuals with WMS includes relative strengths in language and facial processing and profound impairment in spatial cognition. The cognitive profile of abilities, including what is ‘typical’ for individuals with WMS is discussed, but we also highlight areas of variability across the group of individuals with WMS that we have studied. Although the overall cognitive abilities (IQs) of individuals with WMS are typically in the mild-to-moderate range of mental retardation, the peaks and valleys within different cognitive domains make this syndrome especially intriguing to study across levels. Understanding the brain basis (and ultimately the genetic basis) for higher cognitive functioning is the goal we have begun to undertake with this line of interdisciplinary research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Development itself is the key to understanding developmental disorders
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1998) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(98)01230-3 · Cited by 1,299
II. Hypersociability in Williams Syndrome
Jones, W., Bellugi, U., Lai, Z., Chiles, M., Reilly, J., Lincoln, A., & Adolphs, R. (2000) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892900561968 · Cited by 503
Self-citation
Cited by
The weak coherence account: detail-focused cognitive style in autism spectrum disorders
Happé, F., & Frith, U. (2006) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-005-0039-0 · Cited by 2,884
II. Hypersociability in Williams Syndrome
Jones, W., Bellugi, U., Lai, Z., Chiles, M., Reilly, J., Lincoln, A., & Adolphs, R. (2000) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892900561968 · Cited by 503
Self-citationMeyer-Lindenberg, A., Mervis, C. B., & Faith Berman, K. (2006) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1906 · Cited by 411
Mutational Mechanisms of Williams-Beuren Syndrome Deletions
Bayés, M., Magano, L. F., Rivera, N., Flores, R., & A. Pérez Jurado, L. (2003) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/376565 · Cited by 337
“Everybody in the world is my friend” hypersociability in young children with Williams syndrome
Doyle, T. F., Bellugi, U., Korenberg, J. R., & Graham, J. (2004) · American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A · doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.20416 · Cited by 296
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bellugi, U., Lichtenberger, L., Jones, W., Lai, Z., & St. George, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
- Publisher
- MIT Press - Journals
- Published
- 2000-03-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- Supplement 1
- Pages
- 7-29
- ISSN
- 0898-929X (ISSN-L)
- 1530-8898
- OpenAlex
- W2097106481
- Cited by
- 706
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: I. The Neurocognitive Profile of Williams Syndrome: A Complex Pattern of Strengths and Weaknesses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1162/089892900561959
- The paper
- Bellugi, U., Lichtenberger, L., Jones, W., Lai, Z., & St. George, M. (2000). I. The Neurocognitive Profile of Williams Syndrome: A Complex Pattern of Strengths and Weaknesses. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892900561959
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.