Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 273

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Patterns of Activity in the Categorical Representations of Objects

Carlson, Thomas A., Schrater, Paul, He, Sheng·2003·Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Abstract

Object perception has been a subject of extensive fMRI studies in recent years. Yet the nature of the cortical representation of objects in the human brain remains controversial. Analyses of fMRI data have traditionally focused on the activation of individual voxels associated with presentation of various stimuli. The current analysis approaches functional imaging data as collective information about the stimulus. Linking activity in the brain to a stimulus is treated as a pattern-classification problem. Linear discriminant analysis was used to reanalyze a set of data originally published by Ishai et al. (2000), available from the fMRIDC (accession no. 2-2000-1113D). Results of the new analysis reveal that patterns of activity that distinguish one category of objects from other categories are largely independent of one another, both in terms of the activity and spatial overlap. The information used to detect objects from phase-scrambled control stimuli is not essential in distinguishing one object category from another. Furthermore, performing an object-matching task during the scan significantly improved the ability to predict objects from controls, but had minimal effect on object classification, suggesting that the task-based attentional benefit was non-specific to object categories.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/089892903322307429

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-13-04207.1996 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.2307/2965703 · DOI
  3. 10.1038/33402 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1038/jcbfm.1993.4 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1006/nimg.1995.1007 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1038/9224 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00073-6 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1998)6:4<316::AID-HBM9>3.0.CO;2-6 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1126/science.1063736 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Ishai A., 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 35, 10.1162/089892900564055 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1073/pnas.96.16.9379 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1109/42.925291 · DOI
  13. 10.1073/pnas.92.18.8135 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1038/44134 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.2307/1270566 · DOI
  16. 10.1146/annurev.ne.19.030196.000545 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1016/S0959-4388(97)80032-3 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1126/science.272.5268.1665 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1097/00004728-199307000-00004 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 273

Metadata

Authors
Carlson, T. A., Schrater, P., & He, S.
Venue
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Publisher
MIT Press
Published
2003-07-01
Volume
15
Issue
5
Pages
704-717
ISSN
  • 0898-929X (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8898
OpenAlex
W2129158941
Cited by
273
References
2
FWCI
3.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Patterns of Activity in the Categorical Representations of Objects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1162/089892903322307429
The paper
Carlson, T. A., Schrater, P., & He, S. (2003). Patterns of Activity in the Categorical Representations of Objects. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892903322307429

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.