Cited by 1,402Visual perception and processing mechanismsFace Recognition and PerceptionAdvanced Vision and Imaging

Inferotemporal cortex and object vision

Tanaka, Keiji·1996·Annual Review of Neuroscience

Abstract

Cells in area TE of the inferotemporal cortex of the monkey brain selectively respond to various moderately complex object features, and those that cluster in a columnar region that runs perpendicular to the cortical surface respond to similar features. Although cells within a column respond to similar features, their selectivity is not necessarily identical. The data of optical imaging in TE have suggested that the borders between neighboring columns are not discrete; a continuous mapping of complex feature space within a larger region contains several partially overlapped columns. This continuous mapping may be used for various computations, such as production of the image of the object at different viewing angles, illumination conditions, and articulation poses.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.ne.19.030196.000545

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Within the hierarchy of the visual system, neuronal response properties are invariant to more and more parametric changes of the sensory input.

    “Indeed, within the hierarchy of the visual system, neuronal response properties are invariant to more and more parametric changes of the sensory input (Tanaka 1996).”
  • Neurophysiological and optical imaging methods indicate a high degree of local cortical specialization in inferotemporal (IT) neurons, with columnar clustering of cells with similar selectivity.

    “Neurophysiological and optical imaging methods indicate a high degree of local cortical specialization in inferotemporal (IT) neurons (Tanaka, 1996), with columnar clustering of cells with similar selectivity.”
  • From V1 to IT, there is an increase in invariance to position and scale and, in parallel, an increase in the size of the receptive fields and in the complexity of the optimal stimuli for the neurons.

    “From V1 to IT, there is an increase in invariance to position and scale (1, 2, 4-6) and in parallel, an increase in the size of the receptive fields (2, 4) as well as in the complexity of the optimal stimuli for the neurons (2, 3, 7).”
  • The model accounts for the bypass routes from V2 to the posterior inferotemporal cortex and from V4 to the anterior inferotemporal cortex, unlike the original model.

    “In addition to the main routes through the V4 to the IT cortex (4), the model also accounts for the bypass routes (38) from V2 to the posterior inferotemporal cortex and from V4 to the anterior inferotemporal cortex (Fig. 1) [unlike the original model (5)].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tanaka, K.
Affiliations
RIKEN (JP)
Corresponding author
Tanaka, Keiji
Venue
Annual Review of Neuroscience
Published
1996-03
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
109-139
ISSN
  • 0147-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-4126
OpenAlex
W2146656425
Cited by
1,402
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 56 · 2015: 59 · 2014: 72 · 2013: 55 · 2012: 60
FWCI
20.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annual Review of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Vision and Imaging
Keywords
inferotemporal cortex, object vision, area TE, columnar organization, object recognition, viewpoint invariance, illumination invariance, monkey visual cortex
MeSH terms
Animals, Haplorhini, Axonal Transport, Brain Mapping, Neurons, Orientation, Temporal Lobe, Vision, Ocular, Visual Cortex, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review