Cited by 215School Choice and PerformanceSchool Leadership and Teacher PerformanceEducational Assessment and Improvement

Linking Teacher Quality, Student Attendance, and Student Achievement

Open access
Gershenson, Seth·2016·Education Finance and Policy

Abstract

Research on the effectiveness of educational inputs, particularly research on teacher effectiveness, typically overlooks teachers’ potential impact on behavioral outcomes, such as student attendance. Using longitudinal data on teachers and students in North Carolina I estimate teacher effects on primary school student absences in a value-added framework. The analysis yields two main findings: First, teachers have arguably causal, statistically significant effects on student absences that persist over time. Second, teachers who improve test scores do not necessarily improve student attendance, suggesting that effective teaching is multidimensional and teachers who are effective in one domain are not necessarily effective in others.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/edfp_a_00180

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Four studies found weak relationships between teacher effects on academic performance and effects on other outcome measures.

    “Four of the studies described above found weak relationships between teacher effects on students’ academic performance and effects on other outcome measures.”

    From Teacher and Teaching Effects on Students’ Attitudes and Behaviors (2017) · cites this paper as Gershenson (2016)

    The Discussion (p. 19) reports essentially zero correlation between this study’s teacher effects on attendance and academic achievement. The literature review (p. 5) describes similar contrasts for Jennings and DiPrete and for Jackson, but its four cited studies investigated character skills; it does not say all four found weak relationships with academic performance. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gershenson, S.
Affiliations
American University (US)
Corresponding author
Gershenson, Seth
Venue
Education Finance and Policy
Publisher
MIT Press
Published
2016-04
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
125-149
ISSN
  • 1557-3060 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-3079
OpenAlex
W1914601706
Cited by
215
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3
FWCI
91.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Education Finance and Policy (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • American University Research Archive
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Leadership and Teacher Performance
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Educational Assessment and Improvement
Keywords
teacher quality, teacher effectiveness, student attendance, school absenteeism, academic performance, value-added assessment, elementary school students, behavioral effects, North Carolina

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review