Cited by 222School Choice and PerformanceYouth Substance Use and School AttendanceEducational Outcomes and Influences

Assessing the effect of school days and absences on test score performance

Open access
Aucejo, Esteban M., Romano, Teresa Foy·2016·Economics of Education Review

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.econedurev.2016.08.007

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Available research on summer learning deficits, student absenteeism, and extreme weather events suggests that learning progress in mathematics is more dependent on formal instruction than in reading.

    “Available research on summer learning deficits 17,25 , student absenteeism 26,27 and extreme weather events 28 suggests that learning progress in mathematics is more dependent on formal instruction than in reading.”
  • Aucejo and Romano (2016) and Gershenson, Jacknowitz, and Brannegan (2017) show that individual absences have significantly worse effects on the outcomes of low-income students.

    “and Aucejo and Romano (2016) and Gershenson, Jacknowitz, and Brannegan (2017) show that individual absences have significantly worse effects on the outcomes of low-income students.”

    From Educational Inequality* (2022) · cites this paper as Aucejo and Romano (2016)

  • Aucejo and Romano (2016) suggest that individual absences have more adverse effects than do shocks affecting an entire class.

    “They arrive at similar conclusions, suggesting that individual absences have more adverse effects than do shocks affecting an entire class.”

    From Educational Inequality* (2022) · cites this paper as Aucejo and Romano (2016)

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [9]9. Chalkboard Project (2008): "A Review of Research on Extended Learning Time in K-12 Schools," Online.
  2. [19]19. Fitzpatrick, M., D. Grissmer, and S. Hastedt (2011): "What a Difference a Day Makes: Estimating the Effects of Kindergarten on Children's Test Scores," Economics of Education Review, 30(2), 269-279.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aucejo, E. M., & Romano, T. F.
Affiliations
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • Goucher College (US)
Corresponding author
Romano, Teresa Foy
Venue
Economics of Education Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-12
Volume
55
Pages
70-87
ISSN
0272-7757 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2117413632
Cited by
222
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
54.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Economics of Education Review (publishedVersion)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Economic and Social Research Council (ES/M010341/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Education › Youth Substance Use and School Attendance
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Outcomes and Influences
Keywords
school absenteeism, instructional time, standardized testing, student disengagement, achievement gap, North Carolina public schools

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review