The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Strategies of Terrorism
Abstract
Terrorism is designed to change minds by destroying bodies; it is a form of costly signaling. Terrorists employ five primary strategies of costly signaling: attrition, intimidation, provocation, spoiling, and outbidding. The main targets of persuasion are the enemy and the population that the terrorists hope to represent or control. Terrorists wish to signal that they have the strength and will to impose costs on those who oppose them, and that the enemy and moderate groups on the terrorists' side cannot be trusted and should not be supported. Each strategy works well under certain conditions and poorly under others. State responses to one strategy may be inappropriate for other strategies. In some cases, however, terrorists are pursuing a combination of strategies, and the response must also work well against this combination.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War
FEARON, J. D., & LAITIN, D. D. (2003) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055403000534 · Cited by 7,366
Rationalist explanations for war
Fearon, J. D. (1995) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818300033324 · Cited by 3,995
Perception and Misperception in International Politics
Jervis, R. (2017) · doi:10.1515/9781400885114 · Cited by 3,199
The theory of games and the evolution of animal conflicts
Maynard Smith, J. (1974) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(74)90110-6 · Cited by 2,410
Cooperation under the security dilemma
Jervis, R. (1978) · World Politics · doi:10.2307/2009958 · Cited by 2,305
Cooperation Under the Security Dilemma
(2015) · Conflict After the Cold War · doi:10.4324/9781315664484-51 · Cited by 1,555
Schelling, T. C. (1966) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · doi:10.4324/9781315814803-17 · Cited by 1,446
Education, Poverty and Terrorism: Is There a Causal Connection?
Krueger, A. B., & Malečková, J. (2003) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/089533003772034925 · Cited by 1,362
The Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism
PAPE, R. A. (2003) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s000305540300073x · Cited by 1,333
Spoiler Problems in Peace Processes
Stedman, S. J. (1997) · International Security · doi:10.1162/isec.22.2.5 · Cited by 1,295
Cited by
Hall, T. H., & Ross, A. A. G. (2015) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818315000144 · Cited by 289
Why We Kill: The Political Science of Political Violence against Civilians
Valentino, B. A. (2014) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-082112-141937 · Cited by 200
How the Public Defines Terrorism
Huff, C., & Kertzer, J. D. (2018) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12329 · Cited by 173
Resistance in repressive contexts: A comprehensive test of psychological predictors.
Ayanian, A. H., Tausch, N., Acar, Y. G., Chayinska, M., Cheung, W.-Y., & Lukyanova, Y. (2021) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspi0000285 · Cited by 137
“This is a political movement, friend”: Why “incels” support violence
O'Donnell, C., & Shor, E. (2022) · The British Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1111/1468-4446.12923 · Cited by 105
Metadata
- Authors
- Kydd, A. H., & Walter, B. F.
- Venue
- International Security
- Publisher
- MIT Press - Journals
- Published
- 2006-07
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 49-80
- ISSN
- 0162-2889 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-4804
- OpenAlex
- W2019176210
- Cited by
- 772
- References
- 50
- FWCI
- 50.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Strategies of Terrorism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1162/isec.2006.31.1.49
- The paper
- Kydd, A. H., & Walter, B. F. (2006). The Strategies of Terrorism. International Security. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec.2006.31.1.49
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.