The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Activation of Preexisting and Acquired Face Representations: The N250 Event-related Potential as an Index of Face Familiarity
Abstract
Electrophysiological studies using event-related potentials have demonstrated that face stimuli elicit a greater negative brain potential in right posterior recording sites 170 msec after stimulus onset (N170) relative to nonface stimuli. Results from repetition priming paradigms have shown that repeated exposures of familiar faces elicit a larger negative brainwave (N250r) at inferior temporal sites compared to repetitions of unfamiliar faces. However, less is known about the time course and learning conditions under which the N250 face representation is acquired. In the familiarization phase of the Joe/no Joe task, subjects studied a target “Joe” face (“Jane” for female subjects) and, during the course of the experiment, identified a series of sequentially presented faces as either Joe or not Joe. The critical stimulus conditions included the subject's own face, a same-sex Joe ( Jane) face and a same-sex “other” face. The main finding was that the subject's own face produced a focal negative deflection (N250) in posterior channels relative to nontarget faces. The task-relevant Joe target face was not differentiated from other nontarget faces in the first half of the experiment. However, in the second half, the Joe face produced an N250 response that was similar in magnitude to the own face. These findings suggest that the N250 indexes two types of face memories: a preexperimentally familiar face representation (i.e., the “own face” and a newly acquired face representation (i.e., the Joe/Jane face) that was formed during the course of the experiment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical principles in experimental design.
Winer, B. J. (1962) · McGraw-Hill Book Company · doi:10.1037/11774-000 · Cited by 26,755
The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception
Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J., & Chun, M. M. (1997) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.17-11-04302.1997 · Cited by 7,738
McClelland, J. L., McNaughton, B. L., & O'Reilly, R. C. (1995) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.102.3.419 · Cited by 5,256
Berti, A. (1992) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/0028-3932(92)90076-x · Cited by 4,162
Electrophysiological Studies of Face Perception in Humans
Bentin, S., Allison, T., Puce, A., Perez, E., & McCarthy, G. (1996) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.1996.8.6.551 · Cited by 3,076
Augmenting mental chronometry: The P300 as a measure of stimulus evaluation time
Kutas, M., McCarthy, G., & Donchin, E. (1977) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.887923 · Cited by 1,714
On Quantifying Surprise: The Variation of Event‐Related Potentials With Subjective Probability
Duncan‐Johnson, C. C., & Donchin, E. (1977) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1977.tb01312.x · Cited by 1,224
Domain specificity in face perception
Kanwisher, N. (2000) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/77664 · Cited by 968
Conjunctive representations in learning and memory: Principles of cortical and hippocampal function.
O'Reilly, R. C., & Rudy, J. W. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.108.2.311 · Cited by 865
Spatial sampling of head electrical fields: the geodesic sensor net
Tucker, D. M. (1993) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/0013-4694(93)90121-b · Cited by 751
Cited by
The neural basis of visual body perception
Peelen, M. V., & Downing, P. E. (2007) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2195 · Cited by 697
Ito, T. A., & Bartholow, B. D. (2009) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.10.002 · Cited by 246
Multiple cues in social perception: The time course of processing race and facial expression
Kubota, J. T., & Ito, T. A. (2007) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2006.10.023 · Cited by 207
Faja, S., Webb, S. J., Jones, E., Merkle, K., Kamara, D., Bavaro, J., Aylward, E., & Dawson, G. (2012) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-011-1243-8 · Cited by 89
Webb, S. J., Jones, E. J. H., Merkle, K., Murias, M., Greenson, J., Richards, T., Aylward, E., & Dawson, G. (2010) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2010.04.011 · Cited by 85
Metadata
- Authors
- Tanaka, J. W., Curran, T., Porterfield, A. L., & Collins, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
- Publisher
- MIT Press - Journals
- Published
- 2006-09-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1488-1497
- ISSN
- 0898-929X (ISSN-L)
- 1530-8898
- OpenAlex
- W2160785220
- Cited by
- 389
- References
- 53
- FWCI
- 6.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Activation of Preexisting and Acquired Face Representations: The N250 Event-related Potential as an Index of Face Familiarity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1162/jocn.2006.18.9.1488
- The paper
- Tanaka, J. W., Curran, T., Porterfield, A. L., & Collins, D. (2006). Activation of Preexisting and Acquired Face Representations: The N250 Event-related Potential as an Index of Face Familiarity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2006.18.9.1488
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.