Cited by 251Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismNeuroscience and Music PerceptionPhonetics and Phonology Research

Detection of sounds in the auditory stream: event-related fMRI evidence for differential activation to speech and nonspeech

Vouloumanos, Athena, Kiehl, Kent A., Werker, Janet F., Liddle, Peter F.·2001·Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Abstract

The detection of speech in an auditory stream is a requisite first step in processing spoken language. In this study, we used event-related fMRI to investigate the neural substrates mediating detection of speech compared with that of nonspeech auditory stimuli. Unlike previous studies addressing this issue, we contrasted speech with nonspeech analogues that were matched along key temporal and spectral dimensions. In an oddball detection task, listeners heard nonsense speech sounds, matched sine wave analogues (complex nonspeech), or single tones (simple nonspeech). Speech stimuli elicited significantly greater activation than both complex and simple nonspeech stimuli in classic receptive language areas, namely the middle temporal gyri bilaterally and in a locus lateralized to the left posterior superior temporal gyrus. In addition, speech activated a small cluster of the right inferior frontal gyrus. The activation of these areas in a simple detection task, which requires neither identification nor linguistic analysis, suggests they play a fundamental role in speech processing.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/089892901753165890

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Following training, sine-wave speech engages a left-lateralized 'speech mode' network including anterior and posterior temporal cortex (superior temporal gyrus and middle temporal gyrus), inferior frontal gyrus and insula.

    “Following training, SWS engages a left-lateralized 'speech mode' network including anterior and posterior temporal cortex (STG and middle temporal gyrus), IFG and insula (Vouloumanos et al., 2001;Dehaene-Lambertz et al., 2005;Benson et al., 2006;Mo ¨tto ¨nen et al., 2006;McGettigan et al., 2012).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vouloumanos, A., Kiehl, K. A., Werker, J. F., & Liddle, P. F.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Venue
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Publisher
MIT Press
Published
2001-10-01
Volume
13
Issue
7
Pages
994-1005
ISSN
  • 0898-929X (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8898
OpenAlex
W2135006625
Cited by
251
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 11
FWCI
5.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Killam Trusts
  • University of British Columbia
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
Keywords
speech detection, auditory stream segregation, speech perception, non-speech sounds, middle temporal gyrus, posterior superior temporal gyrus, inferior frontal gyrus
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adult, Attention, Auditory Perception, Brain, Evoked Potentials, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Psychomotor Performance, Recruitment, Neurophysiological, Speech Perception, Echo-Planar Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review