The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Overlapping Parietal Activity in Memory and Perception: Evidence for the Attention to Memory Model
Open accessAbstract
The specific role of different parietal regions to episodic retrieval is a topic of intense debate. According to the Attention to Memory (AtoM) model, dorsal parietal cortex (DPC) mediates top–down attention processes guided by retrieval goals, whereas ventral parietal cortex (VPC) mediates bottom–up attention processes captured by the retrieval output or the retrieval cue. This model also hypothesizes that the attentional functions of DPC and VPC are similar for memory and perception. To investigate this last hypothesis, we scanned participants with event-related fMRI whereas they performed memory and perception tasks, each comprising an orienting phase (top–down attention) and a detection phase (bottom–up attention). The study yielded two main findings. First, consistent with the AtoM model, orienting-related activity for memory and perception overlapped in DPC, whereas detection-related activity for memory and perception overlapped in VPC. The DPC overlap was greater in the left intraparietal sulcus, and the VPC overlap in the left TPJ. Around overlapping areas, there were differences in the spatial distribution of memory and perception activations, which were consistent with trends reported in the literature. Second, both DPC and VPC showed stronger connectivity with medial-temporal lobe during the memory task and with visual cortex during the perception task. These findings suggest that, during memory tasks, some parietal regions mediate similar attentional control processes to those involved in perception tasks (orienting in DPC vs. detection in VPC), although on different types of information (mnemonic vs. sensory).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Indeed, Cabeza et al. (2011;2012) have also proposed that the ventral parietal cortex could have an overarching function, but it has subregions that, through different functional connectivity, apply the function to different types of information according to different goals.”
From Functional Heterogeneity and Convergence in the Right Temporoparietal Junction (2016) · cites this paper as Cabeza et al. 2011
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Even if the region of overlap performs a common function such as contextual updating, the pattern of the input to or output from this region could be different depending on the task being performed (Cabeza et al. 2011;Cabeza et al. 2012;Geng and Vossel 2013).”
From Functional Heterogeneity and Convergence in the Right Temporoparietal Junction (2016) · cites this paper as Cabeza et al. 2011
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tzourio-Mazoyer, N., Landeau, B., Papathanassiou, D., Crivello, F., Etard, O., Delcroix, N., Mazoyer, B., & Joliot, M. (2002) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0978 · Cited by 16,319 · cited 1×
“The MTL ROI was derived using the left hippocampus label of the AAL atlas (Tzourio-Mazoyer et al., 2002) in the WFU Pickatlas tool, whereas the visual cortex ROI was created by selecting left BA 17 from Pickatlasʼs Brodmannʼs area labels and dilating the volume by four voxels in three dimensions.”
Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain
Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. (2002) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn755 · Cited by 12,881 · cited 5×
“Although DPC and VPC have been associated, respectively, with top–down and bottom–up attention in both perception (Corbetta & Shulman, 2002) and memory tasks (Cabeza et al., 2008; Ciaramelli et al., 2008), a recent fMRI meta-analysis suggested that the exact locations of top–down and bottom–up…”
InfluentialMaldjian, J. A., Laurienti, P. J., Kraft, R., & Burdette, J. H. (2003) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00169-1 · Cited by 5,066
Measures of Association for Cross Classifications
Goodman, L. A., & Kruskal, W. (1979) · Springer series in statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-9995-0 · Cited by 2,255
The University of South Florida free association, rhyme, and word fragment norms
Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., & Schreiber, T. A. (2004) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03195588 · Cited by 1,961 · cited 1×
“The pairs were selected from free association norms (Nelson, McEvoy, & Schreiber, 2004 ) so that groups of three pairs formed four-word “chains” (eg, dog–cat–tiger–stripe; penguin–tuxedo–prom–date; malt–shake–rattle–snake).”
Parietal lobe contributions to episodic memory retrieval
Wagner, A. D., Shannon, B. J., Kahn, I., & Buckner, R. L. (2005) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.07.001 · Cited by 1,571 · cited 2×
“Although the current study was not designed to compare different hypotheses regarding parietal contributions to episodic retrieval (for a review, see Wagner et al., 2005), the results are more consistent with the AtoM model than with alternative accounts.”
The parietal cortex and episodic memory: an attentional account
Cabeza, R. E. L., Ciaramelli, E., Olson, I. R., & Moscovitch, M. (2008) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2459 · Cited by 1,256 · cited 9×
“In the memory domain, conditions involving demanding memory search or monitoring processes tend to show greater DPC activity, whereas conditions involving rich, attentiongrabbing memories tend to show greater VPC activity (Cabeza et al., 2008).”
InfluentialSelf-citationMeasures of Association for Cross Classifications*
Goodman, L. A., & Kruskal, W. (1954) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1954.10501231 · Cited by 684
Memory retrieval and the parietal cortex: A review of evidence from a dual-process perspective
Vilberg, K. L., & Rugg, M. D. (2008) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.01.004 · Cited by 644 · cited 3×
“Several hypotheses have been advanced to account for the contributions of posterior parietal regions to episodic retrieval (for reviews, see Cabeza, Ciaramelli, Olson, &Moscovitch, 2008; Ciaramelli, Grady, & Moscovitch, 2008; Vilberg & Rugg, 2008; Wagner, Shannon, Kahn, & Buckner, 2005).”
Ciaramelli, E., Grady, C. L., & Moscovitch, M. (2008) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.03.022 · Cited by 534 · cited 4×
“■”
InfluentialSelf-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Episodic memory in normal aging and Alzheimer disease: Insights from imaging and behavioral studies
Tromp, D., Dufour, A., Lithfous, S., Pebayle, T., & Després, O. (2015) · Ageing Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.arr.2015.08.006 · Cited by 390
Cognitive contributions of the ventral parietal cortex: an integrative theoretical account
Cabeza, R., Ciaramelli, E., & Moscovitch, M. (2012) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.04.008 · Cited by 373
Self-citationThe inferior parietal lobule and temporoparietal junction: A network perspective
Igelström, K. M., & Graziano, M. S. A. (2017) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.01.001 · Cited by 367
“One hypothesis is that memory retrieval involves attentional reorienting to spontaneously evoked memories, in a manner analogous to visuospatial reorienting (Cabeza et al., 2012a, 2008, 2011; Ciaramelli et al., 2008).”
The contribution of the human posterior parietal cortex to episodic memory
Sestieri, C., Shulman, G. L., & Corbetta, M. (2017) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn.2017.6 · Cited by 299
Fusion and Fission of Cognitive Functions in the Human Parietal Cortex
Humphreys, G. F., & Ralph, M. A. L. (2014) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhu198 · Cited by 265
“In doing so, this multi-domain meta-analysis was able to preserve the selection criteria and other parameters that are considered highly relevant to researchers working in each subject area (a full description of the method used to define each domain is provided in Supplementary Material) (Cabeza et al. 2008; Ciaramel…”
InfluentialA meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies on divergent thinking using activation likelihood estimation
Wu, X., Yang, W., Tong, D., Sun, J., Chen, Q., Wei, D., Zhang, Q., Zhang, M., & Qiu, J. (2015) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.22801 · Cited by 250
“…resources to memory retrieval based on current goals), whereas the VPC activity reveals the capture of bottom-up attention by the target (attention captured by the bottom-up information that enters a working memory either from the senses or from long-term memory) [Cabeza et al., 2008, 2011].”
BackgroundDavey, J., Cornelissen, P. L., Thompson, H. E., Sonkusare, S., Hallam, G., Smallwood, J., & Jefferies, E. (2015) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4705-14.2015 · Cited by 255
“Alternatively, pMTG and/or AG might contribute to specific conceptual retrieval processes as opposed to aspects of representation (Cabeza et al., 2011; Humphreys and Lambon Ralph, 2014).”
BackgroundMurphy, C., Jefferies, E., Rueschemeyer, S., Sormaz, M., Wang, H.-T., Margulies, D. S., & Smallwood, J. (2018) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.01.017 · Cited by 243
“This pattern of responding in the angular gyrus is consistent with the purported role of inferior parietal cortex in focusing attention on memory (Cabeza et al., 2011).”
ResultBurst and Tonic Spinal Cord Stimulation: Different and Common Brain Mechanisms
Ridder, D. D., & Vanneste, S. (2015) · Neuromodulation Technology at the Neural Interface · doi:10.1111/ner.12368 · Cited by 215
Cona, G., Scarpazza, C., Sartori, G., Moscovitch, M., & Bisiacchi, P. S. (2015) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.02.007 · Cited by 207
Self-citationMemory Systems, Processing Modes, and Components: Functional Neuroimaging Evidence
Cabeza, R., & Moscovitch, M. (2013) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691612469033 · Cited by 163
Self-citationFunctional Heterogeneity in Posterior Parietal Cortex Across Attention and Episodic Memory Retrieval
Hutchinson, J. B., Uncapher, M. R., Weiner, K. S., Bressler, D. W., Silver, M. A., Preston, A. R., & Wagner, A. D. (2012) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhs278 · Cited by 178
Cognitive function during nicotine withdrawal: Implications for nicotine dependence treatment
Ashare, R. L., Falcone, M., & Lerman, C. (2014) · Neuropharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2013.04.034 · Cited by 170
“Neuroimaging studies have also shown that these tasks activate similar brain regions (Cabeza et al., 2011; Hutchinson et al., 2009).”
Short-term memory based on activated long-term memory: A review in response to Norris (2017).
Cowan, N. (2019) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000199 · Cited by 159
“Cabeza et al. (2011) suggested that the overlapping activation in perception and memory for this network suggests an attention-to-memory account, as in the present account.”
Lockhart, S. N., Mayda, A. B. V., Roach, A. E., Fletcher, E. M., Carmichael, O. T., Maillard, P., Schwarz, C. G., Yonelinas, A. P., Ranganath, C., & DeCarli, C. S. (2012) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00056 · Cited by 132
“…regions, performs top-down attentional control of episodic retrieval, biasing medial temporal lobe activity, in a manner similar to the attentional control of sensory perceptual regions (Cabeza, 2008). fMRI studies support this idea of parietal involvement in memory retrieval (Cabeza et al., 2011).”
BackgroundHuijbers, W., Vannini, P., Sperling, R. A., Pennartz, C. M. A., Cabeza, R. E. L., & Daselaar, S. M. (2012) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.08.021 · Cited by 118
“The bottom-up attention account, which is a component of the Attention-to-Memory model (AtoM) (Cabeza, 2008; Cabeza, Ciaramelli, Olson, & Moscovitch, 2008; Ciaramelli, Grady, Levine, Ween, & Moscovitch, 2010; Ciaramelli, Grady, & Moscovitch, 2008) has previously been used to explain the E/R-flip in ventral parietal co…”
Self-citationAn fMRI investigation of posttraumatic flashbacks
Whalley, M. G., Kroes, M. C. W., Huntley, Z., Rugg, M. D., Davis, S. W., & Brewin, C. R. (2013) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2012.10.002 · Cited by 115
“Subsequent analyses have shown greater connectivity between the supramarginal gyrus and occipital areas when a salient perceptual stimulus is detected, but greater connectivity with the MTL when a salient memory is detected (Cabeza et al., 2011).”
BackgroundLückmann, H. C., Jacobs, H. I. L., & Sack, A. T. (2014) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2014.02.002 · Cited by 112
“Connectivity analyses have demonstrated that IPs and TPJ show increased connectivity with the medial temporal lobe (MTL) during episodic retrieval as opposed to visuospatial attentional orienting (Burianová et al., 2012; Cabeza et al., 2011).”
BackgroundDistributed Patterns of Reactivation Predict Vividness of Recollection
St‐Laurent, M., Abdi, H., & Buchsbaum, B. R. (2015) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00839 · Cited by 95
“According to the attention to memory model (Cabeza et al., 2011; Cabeza, Ciaramelli, Olson, & Moscovitch, 2008; Ciaramelli et al., 2008), when a memory is recovered, attention is redirected toward the newly retrieved memory by the ventral parietal cortex, which acts as an attentional circuit breaker.”
BackgroundMethodRemember the Source: Dissociating Frontal and Parietal Contributions to Episodic Memory
Donaldson, D. I., Wheeler, M. E., & Petersen, S. E. (2009) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21242 · Cited by 94
Brem, A., Ran, K., & Pascual‐Leone, Á. (2013) · Handbook of clinical neurology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-53497-2.00055-3 · Cited by 102
“parietal cortex mediates automatic bottom-up attention processes captured by retrieved memory output (detection) (Ciaramelli et al., 2008; Cabeza et al., 2011).”
BackgroundParkinson, C. M., & Wheatley, T. P. (2015) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2015.01.003 · Cited by 81
TMS evidence for a selective role of the precuneus in source memory retrieval
Bonnı̀, S., Veniero, D., Mastropasqua, C., Ponzo, V., Caltagirone, C., Bozzali, M., & Koch, G. (2014) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2014.12.032 · Cited by 78
Nieuwenhuis, S., Elzinga, B. M., Ras, P. H., Berends, F., Duijs, P., Samara, Z., & Slagter, H. A. (2012) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2012.10.003 · Cited by 74
“One of these is the intraparietal sulcus, an area that is thought to play a role in top-down attention to episodic memory targets (Simons, Peers, Mazuz, Berryhill, & Olson, 2010) or confidence in episodic memory retrieval (Cabeza et al., 2011).”
Sormaz, M., Jefferies, E., Bernhardt, B. C., Karapanagiotidis, T., Mollo, G., Bernasconi, N., Bernasconi, A., Hartley, T., & Smallwood, J. (2017) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.02.071 · Cited by 70
The human hippocampus is sensitive to the durations of events and intervals within a sequence
Barnett, A. J., O’Neil, E. B., Watson, H. C., & Lee, A. C. H. (2014) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.09.011 · Cited by 70
Sensitive individuals are more creative
Bridges, D., & Schendan, H. E. (2018) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2018.09.015 · Cited by 80
“…that aligns attention externally to relevant sensory stimulation (Connor, Egeth, & Yantis, 2004; Corbetta & Shulman, 2002; Posner & Rothbart, 2007) or internally to explicit memory (Binder & Desai, 2011; Buckner et al., 2008), as described in the attention to memory model (Cabeza et al., 2011).”
Parietal lesion effects on cued recall following pair associate learnin g
Feldman, S. B.-Z., Soroker, N., & Levy, D. A. (2015) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.05.009 · Cited by 61
“Suggestions regarding the contribution of parietal areas to memory include attentional functions (e.g. Cabeza, 2008; Cabeza et al., 2011; Ciaramelli et al., 2010,, 2008), expectation and salience (Buchsbaum et al., 2011; Jaeger et al., 2013; O'Connor et al., 2010), retrieval buffering (e.g.,…”
BackgroundDynamic internal states shape memory retrievalPreprint
Tarder-Stoll, H., Jayakumar, M., Dimsdale-Zucker, H. R., Günseli, E., & Aly, M. (2019) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107328 · Cited by 67
Impaired perception of mnemonic oldness, but not mnemonic newness, after parietal lobe damage
Hower, K. H., Wixted, J. T., Berryhill, M. E., & Olson, I. R. (2014) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.02.014 · Cited by 62
“Several researchers (e.g., Cabeza et al., 2011; Ciaramelli, Grady, & Moscovitch, 2008; Ciaramelli, et al., 2010; Hutchinson, Uncapher, & Wagner, 2009; Jaeger, Konkel, & Dobbins, 2013; Vilberg & Rugg, 2008) have demonstrated that the dorsal and ventral regions of the PPC exhibit differential…”
BackgroundSelf-citationFunctional Fractionation of the Stimulus-Driven Attention Network
Han, S. W., & Marois, R. (2014) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4975-13.2014 · Cited by 59
Igelström, K. M., Webb, T. W., Kelly, Y. T., & Graziano, M. S. A. (2016) · eNeuro · doi:10.1523/eneuro.0060-16.2016 · Cited by 57
“…of processes, an ability of multivoxel pattern analysis to discriminate different tasks within regions of overlap, and distinct connectivity patterns of activation foci (Hutchinson et al., 2009; Scholz et al., 2009; Cabeza et al., 2011, 2012; Daselaar et al., 2013; Lee and McCarthy, 2016).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialFunctional Heterogeneity and Convergence in the Right Temporoparietal Junction
Lee, S. M., & McCarthy, G. (2016) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhu292 · Cited by 51
“performed (Cabeza et al. 2011; Cabeza et al. 2012; Geng andVossel 2013).”
BackgroundBurianová, H., Ciaramelli, E., Grady, C. L., & Moscovitch, M. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.07.057 · Cited by 52
“…connection that we found between the DPC and left hippocampus during cued recognition memory supports the hypothesis that the left DPC initiates a search for the original associate of cuewords, biasing activity in the hippocampus in accordance with retrieval goals (see also Cabeza et al., 2011).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSelf-citationJaeger, A., Konkel, A., & Dobbins, I. G. (2013) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.02.018 · Cited by 49
Zimmermann, J. F., Moscovitch, M., & Alain, C. (2015) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2015.11.032 · Cited by 50
“The identification of distinct pathways in the parietal cortex for top–down attentional processes (e.g., goal-directed attention) and lower-level sensory input was initially founded in the visual modality (Cabeza et al., 2011; Ciaramelli et al., 2010).”
Self-citationMemory Retrieval in Mice and MenPreprint
Ben-Yakov, A., Dudai, Y., & Mayford, M. R. (2015) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a021790 · Cited by 54
“In the context of our discussion, this emphasizes the importance of understanding not only the role of each brain region in retrieval, but also how different regions interact to support distinct mnemonic functions, including retrieval (Simons and Spiers 2003; Mendelsohn et al. 2010; Cabeza et al. 2011; Huijbers et al.…”
Guerin, S. A., Robbins, C. A., Gilmore, A. W., & Schacter, D. L. (2012) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.08.020 · Cited by 48
“On the other hand, some overlap between visual attention and episodic memory can be observed within the parietal cortex (Cabeza et al., 2011).”
Electrically stimulating prefrontal cortex at retrieval improves recollection accuracy
Gray, S. J., Brookshire, G., Casasanto, D. J., & Gallo, D. A. (2015) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2015.09.003 · Cited by 47
Functional Interactions Between Large-Scale Networks During Memory Search
Kragel, J. E., & Polyn, S. M. (2013) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bht258 · Cited by 49
“Among theories of PPC function, the " attention to memory " (AtoM) account (Cabeza et al. 2008, 2011; Ciaramelli et al. 2008) explains retrieval-related activation within parietal cortex as a result of dissociable attention-based functions within dorsal and ventral parietal cortex.”
Self-citationLong, N. M., Kuhl, B. A., & Chun, M. M. (2018) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119170174.epcn109 · Cited by 46
Towards an understanding of parietal mnemonic processes: some conceptual guideposts
Levy, D. A. (2012) · Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnint.2012.00041 · Cited by 43
“…in parietal mnemonic activations, which Kim (2012) labels the cognitive Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience www.frontiersin.org July 2012 | Volume 6 | Article 41 | 7 control network, intuitively brings to mind the AtoM hypothesis (Cabeza et al., 2008, 2011; Ciaramelli et al., 2008, 2010).”
BackgroundInfluentialBrain mechanisms supporting violated expectations of pain
Zeidan, F., Lobanov, O. V., Kraft, R. A., & Coghill, R. C. (2015) · Pain · doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000231 · Cited by 41
“of violated expectations by retrieving episodic memory details from expected perceptual schemas [11; 12; 25; 41; 53].”
From Sonic Environment to Soundscape
Botteldooren, D. B., Andringa, T., Aspuru, I., Brown, L., Dubois, D. S., Guastavino, C., Kang, J., Lavandier, C., Nilsson, M. E., Preis, A., et al. (2015) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/b19145-3 · Cited by 38
“According to the attention to memory model hypothesis, very similar attention mechanisms are involved in memory tasks, on the one hand, and sensory processing tasks, on the other (Cabeza et al., 2011).”
Manginelli, A. A., Baumgartner, F., & Pollmann, S. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.11.025 · Cited by 39
“This differential pattern between a search-efficiency-related working memory demand along the IPS and a retrieval-related activation in the TPJ region fits well with a distinction that has been proposed by Cabeza et al. (2011) for the parietal involvement in explicit memory.”
BackgroundDissociation of recollection-related neural activity in ventral lateral parietal cortex
Yu, S. S., Johnson, J. D., & Rugg, M. D. (2012) · Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/17588928.2012.669363 · Cited by 37
“However, in a study that attempted to directly assess the amount of overlap between attentional re-orienting and successful retrieval (Cabeza et al., 2011), the two classes of effect were found to partially overlap.”
BackgroundThe Role of Attention in Conscious Recollection
Brigard, F. D. (2012) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00029 · Cited by 36
“…is involved in voluntary, goal-directed attention, whereas the ventral parietal cortex, which is usually involved in bottom-up attention, appears to be associated with involuntary recollection (see Hutchinson et al., 2009, for some counter-evidence, but also Cabeza et al., 2011, for a response).”
BackgroundNeuronal baseline shifts underlying boundary setting during free recall
Norman, Y., Yeagle, E. M., Harel, M., Mehta, A. D., & Malach, R. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-01184-1 · Cited by 36
Attention network dysfunction underlies memory impairment in posterior cortical atrophy
Veldsman, M., Zamboni, G., Butler, C., & Ahmed, S. (2019) · NeuroImage Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101773 · Cited by 33
“The dorsal PPC regions shows activation in association with verbal episodic memory tasks requiring participants to orient to internally retrieved memories (Cabeza et al., 2011).”
InfluentialItem familiarity and controlled associative retrieval in Alzheimer's disease: an fMRI study.
Genon, S., Collette, F., Feyers, D., Phillips, C., Salmon, E., & Bastin, C. (2013) · Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2012.11.017 · Cited by 30
“The location of this peak of activation is congruent with previous fMRI findings, showing that dorsal parietal activations during memory tasks tend to be in the lower part of this region, that is, the lateral bank of the IPS (Cabeza et al., 2011; Hutchinson et al., 2009).”
ResultInfluentialAttention to memory: orienting attention to sound object representations
Backer, K. C., & Alain, C. (2013) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-013-0531-7 · Cited by 40
Daselaar, S. M., Huijbers, W., Eklund, K., Moscovitch, M., & Cabeza, R. E. L. (2013) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00038 · Cited by 30
“However, a study that compared attention-reorienting and recollection directly within-participants found overlapping activations with some differences in distribution (Cabeza et al., 2011).”
BackgroundSelf-citationWhen the mind’s eye prevails: The Internal Dominance over External Attention (IDEA) hypothesis
Verschooren, S., & Egner, T. (2023) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-023-02272-8 · Cited by 34
“These findings are in line with the attention-to-memory model, which proposes that the dorsal/ventral system distinction present in external attention also applies for attending to internal (mnemonic) representations (Cabeza et al., 2011; Ciaramelli et al., 2008; see also Asplund et al., 2010).”
Kragel, J. E., & Polyn, S. M. (2015) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00881 · Cited by 28
“A similar approach has been taken in recent work, demonstrating shared engagement of neural circuits across both visual search and memory search tasks (Cabeza et al., 2011) as well as recognition and cued recall tasks (Hayama et al.”
ResultSelf-citationPergolizzi, D., & Chua, E. F. (2016) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2016.06.009 · Cited by 28
Tan, R. J., Rugg, M. D., & Lega, B. C. (2020) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107595 · Cited by 27
Brain Volumetric Correlates of Memory in Early Parkinson's Disease
Ellfolk, U., Joutsa, J., Rinne, J. O., Parkkola, R. K., Jokinen, P., & Karrasch, M. (2013) · Journal of Parkinson s Disease · doi:10.3233/jpd-130276 · Cited by 24
“Activation studies have shown that the parietal lobe is one of the most frequently activated areas also during episodic memory retrieval [42], and that dorsal and ventral parietal cortex have distinct functions within episodic memory, as well as overlapping activity for memory and perception [43, 44].”
Ciaramelli, E., Burianová, H., Vallesi, A., Cabeza, R. E. L., & Moscovitch, M. (2020) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2020.563768 · Cited by 24
“For example, in a cued recognition experiment, DPC was active when participants anticipated a target based on a memory cue, whereas VPC mediated fast detection of memory targets in the absence of cues (Ciaramelli et al., 2010a; see also Cabeza et al., 2011).”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationServais, A., Hurter, C., & Barbeau, E. J. (2023) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-023-02270-w · Cited by 22
“It is therefore assumed that perception and memory require similar attentional control processes (Cabeza et al., 2011).”
Monge, Z. A., Wing, E. A., Stokes, J. D., & Cabeza, R. E. L. (2017) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.07.030 · Cited by 22
“, 2012) and LM (Cabeza et al., 2011; Ciaramelli et al., 2010; Polyn et al., 2005), different regions are activated at different retrieval stages.”
BackgroundSelf-citationLee, S., Chang, M. Y., Kwon, B., Choi, B. Y., Koo, J., Moon, T., Ridder, D. D., Vanneste, S., & Song, J. (2021) · Hearing Research · doi:10.1016/j.heares.2021.108356 · Cited by 22
Contributions of the ventral parietal cortex to declarative memory
Davis, S. W., Wing, E. A., & Cabeza, R. E. L. (2018) · Handbook of clinical neurology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-63622-5.00027-9 · Cited by 23
“To investigate this assumption, Cabeza et al. (2011) had participants search for and detect a memory target (i.e., the last word of a previously encoded word quartet: e.g., dog – cat – tiger – stripe) or a visual target (i.e., a vowel in a stream of consonants).”
InfluentialSelf-citationChoice-predictive activity in parietal cortex during source memory decisions
Guidotti, R., Tosoni, A., Perrucci, M. G., & Sestieri, C. (2019) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.01.071 · Cited by 25
“However, evidence for such MTL-parietal functional coupling during memory decision-making is scarce (Cabeza et al., 2011; Geib et al., 2017; Kuhl et al., 2013).”
Das, A., & Menon, V. (2024) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhae287 · Cited by 22
fMRI evidence supporting the role of memory conflict in the déjà vu experience
Urquhart, J. A., Sivakumaran, M. H., Macfarlane, J. A., & O’Connor, A. R. (2018) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2018.1524496 · Cited by 22
“Glucose metabolism between seizures was measured, with reductions relative to non-déjà vu-experiencing patients observed in the MTL, but also in the parietal cortex, a region implicated in attention to memory (Cabeza et al., 2011; O'Connor, Han, & Dobbins, 2010).”
MethodNovel Cognitive Functions Arise at the Convergence of Macroscale Gradients
Jung, H., Wager, T. D., & Carter, R. M. (2021) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01803 · Cited by 20
“Cabeza et al. (2011) show that the superior parietal lobule performs strategic memory retrieval, a combination of memory and top–down attention from the dorsal streams.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialThe functional dissociation of posterior parietal regions during multimodal memory formation
Jablonowski, J., & Rose, M. (2022) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.25861 · Cited by 21
“We suggest that this functional difference can be attributed to two different processing modes related to the developed memory as outlined in previous theories (Cabeza et al., 2008, 2011).”
BackgroundMethodMeng, A., Kaiser, M., de Graaf, T. A., Duecker, F., Sack, A. T., Weerd, P. D., & van de Ven, V. G. (2021) · Neurobiology of Learning and Memory · doi:10.1016/j.nlm.2021.107444 · Cited by 21
Atmaca, S., Stadler, W., Keitel, A., Ott, D. V. M., Lepsien, J., & Prinz, W. (2013) · Brain and Behavior · doi:10.1002/brb3.180 · Cited by 19
Expectations of Task Demands Dissociate Working Memory and Long-Term Memory Systems
Zanto, T. P., Clapp, W. C., Rubens, M. T., Karlsson, J., & Gazzaley, A. H. (2015) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhu307 · Cited by 17
Gray, O. J., Fry, L., & Montaldi, D. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-72228-8 · Cited by 17
Kwok, S. C., & Macaluso, E. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep11248 · Cited by 17
Yang, P., Fan, C., Wang, M., Fogelson, N., & Li, L. (2017) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.06.031 · Cited by 17
Zanto, T. P., & Rissman, J. (2015) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-397025-1.00242-6 · Cited by 18
Masouleh, S. K., Herzig, S., Klose, L., Roggenhofer, E., Tenckhoff, H., Kaiser, T., Thöne-Otto, A. I. T., Wiese, M., Berg, T., Schroeter, M., et al. (2016) · Journal of Viral Hepatitis · doi:10.1111/jvh.12634 · Cited by 16
Das, A., & Menon, V. (2023) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1728-22.2023 · Cited by 17
“The dPPC is involved in top-down attention processing during memory encoding (Cabeza, 2008; Ciaramelli et al., 2008; Daselaar et al., 2009; Hutchinson et al., 2009; Uncapher and Wagner, 2009; Cabeza et al., 2011, 2012).”
BackgroundCabeza, R. E. L., Ciaramelli, E., & Moscovitch, M. (2012) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.06.015 · Cited by 15
Self-citationAlnimer, A. A., Smith, D. S., & Parker, W. J. (2023) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.140500 · Cited by 14
Deeper insights into semantic relations: An fMRI study of part-whole and functional associations
Mühlhaus, J., Heim, S., Altenbach, F., Chatterjee, A. K., Habel, U., & Saß, K. (2014) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2014.01.003 · Cited by 15
“operating on perceptual information coming from sensory regions (Cabeza et al., 2011).”
BackgroundChen, N.-F., Lo, C. M., Liu, T., & Cheng, S.-K. (2016) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.06.032 · Cited by 15
“…intraparietal sulcus, subserve top-down and bottom-up attention processes respectively (Burianová, Ciaramelli, Grady, & Moscovitch, 2012; Cabeza, 2008; Cabeza et al., 2011; Cabeza, Ciaramelli, & Moscovitch, 2012; Cabeza, Ciaramelli, Olson, & Moscovitch, 2008; Ciaramelli, Grady, & Moscovitch, 2008).”
Murphy, C., Jefferies, E., Rueschemeyer, S., Sormaz, M., Wang, H.-T., Margulies, D. S., & Smallwood, J. (2017) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/150466 · Cited by 14
Wu, X., Guo, J., Wang, Y., Zou, F., Guo, P., Lv, J., & Zhang, M. (2020) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2020.576114 · Cited by 14
Age-related similarities and differences in brain activity underlying reversal learning
Nashiro, K., Sakaki, M., Nga, L., & Mather, M. (2013) · Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnint.2013.00037 · Cited by 14
“…that the ventral parietal cortex, which showed the most age differences during neutral reversal, reflects bottom-up attention processes elicited by the retrieval cues or by behaviorally relevant stimuli, especially when they are unexpected (Corbetta and Shulman, 2002; Cabeza et al., 2008, 2011).”
Individual differences in EEG correlates of recognition memory due to DAT polymorphisms
Medrano, P., Nyhus, E., Smolen, A., Curran, T., & Ross, R. S. (2017) · Brain and Behavior · doi:10.1002/brb3.870 · Cited by 12
“Previous studies utilizing functional MRI have identified increased activity in the parietal cortex during episodic memory retrieval (for reviews, see: Cabeza, Ciaramelli, Olson, & Moscovitch, 2008; Cabeza et al., 2011; Ciaramelli, Grady, & Moscovitch, 2008; Donaldson, Wheeler, & Peterson, 2009; Hutchinson, Uncapher,…”
BackgroundKizilirmak, J. M., Rösler, F., Bien, S., & Khader, P. H. (2015) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2015.04.012 · Cited by 12
Brain activity patterns underlying memory confidence
Wynn, S. C., & Nyhus, E. (2022) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/ejn.15649 · Cited by 14
“DPC activity has been linked to familiarity before (Cabeza et al., 2011; Ciaramelli et al., 2008), but these findings suggest that a more accurate interpretation of the activity patterns might be memory uncertainty.”
BackgroundThe role of paying attention to sounds in soundscape perception
Botteldooren, D. B., Boes, M., Oldoni, D., & Coensel, B. D. (2012) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.4708755 · Cited by 12
“According to the attention to memory model hypothesis that very similar attention mechanism are involved in memory tasks at the one hand and sensory processing tasks at the other [Cabeza et al., 2011].”
MethodAttentional capture mediates the emergence and suppression of intrusive memories
Legrand, N., Etard, O., Viader, F., Clochon, P., Doidy, F., Eustache, F., & Gagnepain, P. (2022) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2022.105516 · Cited by 14
“The ventral parietal cortex, a region strongly associated with bottom-up attentional capture,(24,25) is also engaged during remembering.(26) Although the local processing of perceptual and memory content is segregated in this region,(27,28) pattern-information analysis has been used to track memory reactivation in the…”
What Happened When? Cerebral Processing of Modified Structure and Content in Episodic Cueing
Siestrup, S., Jainta, B., El-Sourani, N., Trempler, I., Wurm, M. F., Wolf, O. T., Cheng, S., & Schubotz, R. I. (2022) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01862 · Cited by 13
“This is especially important when additional postretrieval processes are necessary to discriminate between what is true memorized content and what is not (Cabeza et al., 2011; Ciaramelli, Grady, & 2008).”
BackgroundWei, Z., Alcauter, S., Jin, K., Peng, Z., & Gao, W. (2013) · Brain Connectivity · doi:10.1089/brain.2012.0125 · Cited by 11
“, 2006) and have been related to a dorsal attention network involved in preparing and applying goal-directed selection for stimuli and responses (Cabeza et al., 2011; Corbetta and Shulman, 2002).”
Szamosi, A., Levy‐Gigi, E., Kelemen, O., & Kéri, S. (2012) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2012.11.001 · Cited by 12
Top-Down Task Goals Induce the Retrieval State
Smith, D. E., & Long, N. M. (2024) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0452-24.2024 · Cited by 10
Cross-cultural comparison of the neural correlates of true and false memory retrieval
Leger, K. R., Cho, I., Valoumas, I., Schwartz, D. B., Mair, R. W., Goh, J. O. S., & Gutchess, A. H. (2024) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2024.2307923 · Cited by 8
“Specifically, superior parietal lobule shows increased activation in response to perceptual search (Sestieri et al., 2010), and retrieval goals can guide this top-down attentional process (Cabeza et al., 2008; Cabeza et al., 2011).”
Listening back in time: Does attention to memory facilitate word-in-noise identification?
Chan, T. M. V., & Alain, C. (2018) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-018-1586-8 · Cited by 9
“…word can act as a cue to refresh a representation of a word-in-noise, and aid in its identification, was founded upon a model of auditory attention to memory (Zimmermann, Moscovitch, & Alain, 2016), based upon the initial model in vision (Cabeza et al., 2011; Ciaramelli, Grady, & Moscovitch, 2008).”
BackgroundPeters, S. L., & Sheldon, S. (2020) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2020.112911 · Cited by 7
Decreased Efficiency of Between-Network Dynamics During Early Memory Consolidation With Aging
Fassbender, R. V., Risius, O. J., Dronse, J., Richter, N., Gramespacher, H., Befahr, Q., Fink, G. R., Kukolja, J., & Onur, O. A. (2022) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2022.780630 · Cited by 7
Midrigan-Ciochina, L., Vodacek, K. P., Balabhadra, S., & Corina, D. P. (2023) · Bilingualism Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728923000445 · Cited by 9
“More recently, the bilateral AG has been shown to be involved in focusing attention on memory when information in memory has to be evaluated internally and has associated this region with the default mode network (Cabeza et al., 2011; Sormaz et al., 2018a, 2018b).”
BackgroundThe formation of source memory under distraction
Park, H., Leal, F., Abellanoza, C., & Schaeffer, J. D. (2014) · Behavioral and Brain Functions · doi:10.1186/1744-9081-10-40 · Cited by 7
“Second, in order to assess the pattern of activation in a-priori regions and to complement the whole-brain analysis, we adopted anatomical regions of interest (ROI) approach [55].”
MethodSalsano, I., Santangelo, V., & Macaluso, E. (2021) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-021-02221-y · Cited by 6
Wang, J., Tambini, A., Pritschet, L., Taylor, C. M., Jacobs, E. G., & Lapate, R. C. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-63633-6 · Cited by 10
“During memory tasks, the functional coupling between HPC and VAN is enhanced 114,115 , which in turn relates to mnemonic quality 116 .”
Metadata
- Authors
- Cabeza, R., Mazuz, Y. S., Stokes, J., Kragel, J. E., Woldorff, M. G., Ciaramelli, E., Olson, I. R., & Moscovitch, M.
- Affiliations
- Duke University (US)
- University of Bologna (IT)
- Temple University (US)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
- Publisher
- MIT Press - Journals
- Published
- 2011-11-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3209-3217
- ISSN
- 0898-929X (ISSN-L)
- 1530-8898
- PMC
- PMC3518433
- OpenAlex
- W2101277424
- Cited by
- 148
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 7.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging (R01AG019731, AG 19731, AG23770, R01AG023770, R56AG023770)
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH091113)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Keywords
- dorsal parietal cortex, episodic memory retrieval, top-down attention, bottom-up attention, orienting, detection, intraparietal sulcus, temporoparietal junction, visual cortex connectivity
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Attention, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neural Pathways, Orientation, Oxygen, Paired-Associate Learning, Parietal Lobe, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time, Mental Recall, Visual Perception, Vocabulary, Linear Models, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review