Cited by 842Media Influence and PoliticsElectoral Systems and Political ParticipationNews Media Framing and Political Communication

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Television and Voter Turnout*

Open access
Gentzkow, Matthew·2006·Quarterly Journal of Economics

Abstract

I use variation across markets in the timing of television's introduction to identify its impact on voter turnout. The estimated effect is significantly negative, accounting for between a quarter and a half of the total decline in turnout since the 1950s. I argue that substitution away from other media with more political coverage provides a plausible mechanism linking television to voting. As evidence for this, I show that the entry of television in a market coincided with sharp drops in consumption of newspapers and radio, and in political knowledge as measured by election surveys. I also show that both the information and turnout effects were largest in off-year congressional elections, which receive extensive coverage in newspapers but little or no coverage on television.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/qjec.121.3.931

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 0 references

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. Barnouw, Erik, Tube of Plenty: The Evolution of American Television (New York: Oxford University Press, 1990). · DOI
  2. Brody, Richard A. "The Puzzle of Political Participation in America," in Anthony Stephen King, ed., The New American Political System (Washington, DC: AEI Press, 1979).
  3. DellaVigna, Stefano, and Ethan Kaplan, "The Fox News Effect: Media Bias and Voting," mimeo, University of California Berkeley, 2006. · DOI
  4. Feddersen Timothy, 2004, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 112
  5. 10.1007/BF00988577 · DOI
  6. Gentzkow, Matthew, "Television and Voter Turnout," mimeo, University of Chicago, 2005. · DOI
  7. George, Lisa, and Joel Waldfogel, "The New York Times and the Market for Local Newspapers," American Economic Review, 2006, forthcoming. · DOI
  8. Gerber Alan S, 2000, American Political Science Review, 653, 10.2307/2585837 · DOI
  9. Graber, Doris A., Media Power in Politics (Washington, DC: CQ Press, 2000).
  10. 10.1111/j.0092-5853.2005.00113.x · DOI
  11. Mickelson, Sig, "The Use of Television," in James M. Cannon, ed., Politics U.S.A.: A Practical Guide to the Winning of Public Office (Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1960), pp. 285-301.
  12. Mondak Jeffery J, 1995, American Journal of Political Science, 513, 10.2307/2111623 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/0261-3794(92)90022-X · DOI
  14. Oberholzer-Gee Felix, 2001, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No., 28
  15. Pew Research Center, "Biennial Media Consumption Survey: Final Topline," Retrieved August 8, 2002, http://people-press.org/reports.
  16. Piven, Frances Fox, and Richard A. Cloward, Why Americans Still Don't Vote: And Why Politicians Want It that Way (Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 2000).
  17. Prysby Charles L, 1987, in Samuel Long, ed., Annual Review of Political Science, II (Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews Inc., 111
  18. Putnam, Robert D., Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2000). · DOI
  19. Robinson, John P., and Geoffrey Godbey, Time for Life: The Surprising Ways Americans Use Their Time (University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1999).
  20. Rusk, Jerrold G., A Statistical History of the American Electorate (Washington, DC: CQ Press, 2001).
  21. Slotten, Hugh Richard, Radio and Television Regulation: Broadcast Technology in the United States, 1920 -1960 (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2000).
  22. Stanton Frank, 1962, Columbia Journalism Review, 10
  23. Sterling, Christopher H., Electronic Media: A Guide to Trends in Broadcasting and Newer Technologies, 1920 -1983 (New York, NY: Praeger, 1984). · DOI
  24. Sterling, Christopher H., and John M. Kittross, Stay Tuned: A History of American Broadcasting (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2001). · DOI
  25. Stromberg David, 2004, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 221

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 501–592 of 592

Metadata

Authors
Gentzkow, M.
Affiliations
University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Gentzkow, Matthew
Venue
Quarterly Journal of Economics
Published
2006-08
Volume
121
Issue
3
Pages
931-972
ISSN
  • 0033-5533 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-4650
OpenAlex
W2133689495
Cited by
842
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 52 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 69 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 53 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 26
FWCI
77.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Quarterly Journal of Economics (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Social Sciences › Communication › News Media Framing and Political Communication
Keywords
television, voter turnout, media substitution, political coverage, newspaper readership, radio listening, political knowledge, congressional elections, media influence on voters

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review