Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,187

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ruggedness: The Blessing of Bad Geography in Africa

Open access
Nunn, Nathan, Puga, Diego·2012·Review of Economics and Statistics
DOI 10.1162/rest_a_00161
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

There is controversy about whether geography matters mainly because of its contemporaneous impact on economic outcomes or because of its interaction with historical events.Looking at terrain ruggedness, we are able to estimate the importance of these two channels.Because rugged terrain hinders trade and most productive activities, it has a negative direct effect on income.However, in Africa rugged terrain afforded protection to those being raided during the slave trades.Since the slave trades retarded subsequent economic development, in Africa ruggedness has also had a historical indirect positive effect on income.Studying all countries worldwide, we find that both effects are significant statistically and that for Africa the indirect positive effect dominates the direct negative effect.Looking within Africa, we also provide evidence that the indirect effect operates through the slave trades.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/rest_a_00161

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. 10.1162/003355302320935025 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1111/j.1467-8373.2005.00274.x · DOI
  3. 10.2307/2717386 · DOI
  4. Bah Thierno Mouctar, 1976, African Environment, 76, 3
  5. 10.1162/qjec.2006.121.2.587 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1093/oep/gpf064 · DOI
  7. 10.3982/ECTA8121 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Gallup John Luke, 2001, American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 64, 1, 10.4269/ajtmh.2001.64.1 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1017/S0021853700010707 · DOI
  10. Hubbell Andrew, 2001, Journal of African History, 42, 25, 10.1017/S0021853700007805 · DOI
  11. Kiszewski Anthony, 2004, American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 70, 486, 10.4269/ajtmh.2004.70.486 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1023/B:AARR.0000030785.72144.4a · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1257/jel.46.2.285 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Marchesseau G., 1945, Bulletin de la Société d'Etudes Camerounaises, 10, 7
  15. 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2006.01045.x · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1162/qjec.2008.123.1.139 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Nunn Nathan, American Economic Review (forthcoming).
  18. 10.1257/app.1.4.1 · DOI
  19. Podlewski André Michel, 1961, Recherches et Etudes Camerounaises, 4, 1
  20. Ramcharan Rodney, 2006, International Monetary Fund working paper, 35
  21. 10.1023/A:1022870216673 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Riley Shawn J, 1999, Intermountain Journal of Sciences, 5, 1
  23. 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2006.01.008 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1038/scientificamerican0301-70 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1016/S0014-2921(01)00125-8 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1257/jep.14.3.217 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Nunn, N., & Puga, D.
Venue
Review of Economics and Statistics
Publisher
MIT Press
Published
2012-02
Volume
94
Issue
1
Pages
20-36
ISSN
  • 0034-6535 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-9142
DOI
10.1162/rest_a_00161
OpenAlex
W2889827801
Cited by
1,187
References
5
FWCI
57.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.