Turning up the Volume on Man’s Best Friend: Ethical Issues Associated with Commercial Dog Breeding
Open accessAbstract
As the dog’s popularity as a human companion has grown, demand for purebred dogs has likewise escalated. Commercial breeding of dogs, which currently helps to meet such demands has become a point of social contention. The co-evolution of dogs and humans and the unique, familial relationships people have developed with them suggest that they are owed special consideration of their needs and interests that is independent of their utility to humans. Not surprisingly, opposition to commercial breeding enterprises has increased dramatically in the past decade in the US and abroad, spawning a growing number of legislative initiatives aimed at regulating such operations, which are widely believed to harm dogs. Among the most significant ethical problems embedded in commercial dog breeding are the potential for insults to the human-dog bond, failure to duly consider and meet duties of care to dogs, including dogs’ welfare needs and interests, and insufficient regulation of dog care standards. The shortage of published science on the actual conditions experienced by dogs in commercial breeding kennels complicates understanding of the nature and severity of problems as well as solutions. It is argued that despite the concerns associated with commercial dog breeding, abolishing the practice without identifying an ethically preferable alternative that meets demands could result in even worse consequences for dogs. Given this problem, commercial breeding could be ethically defensible under conditions that vastly reduce or eliminate potential for dog suffering, and with strict regulatory oversight of corresponding standards of care for dogs.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Insufficient consideration of dogs' welfare needs and interests leads to potential harm and suffering.
“This, in turn, would mean insufficient consideration of dogs’ welfare needs and interests, leading to potential harm and suffering [16].”
From Ethical Concerns about Fashionable Dog Breeding (2024) · cites this paper as [16]
Commercial dog breeding, especially of fashionable breeds, can lead to a breakdown in the human-dog bond, as dogs are treated as commodities rather than valued companions.
“In this scenario, commercial dog breeding, especially of fashionable breeds (those that become commercially most popular in a very short time), can lead to a breakdown in the human–dog bond, as dogs are treated as commodities rather than valued companions [16].”
From Ethical Concerns about Fashionable Dog Breeding (2024) · cites this paper as [16]
Cites
Epigenetics and the biological definition of gene×environment interactions
Meaney, M. J. (2010) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01381.x · Cited by 1,239 · see citing works
Environmental Enrichment Reverses the Effects of Maternal Separation on Stress Reactivity
Francis, D. D., Diorio, J., Plotsky, P. M., & Meaney, M. J. (2002) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.22-18-07840.2002 · Cited by 663 · see citing works
Dog ownership and physical activity: a review of the evidence.
Christian, H. E., Westgarth, C., Bauman, A., Richards, E. A., Rhodes, R. E., Evenson, K. R., Mayer, J. A., & Thorpe, R. J. (2013) · Journal of Physical Activity and Health · doi:10.1123/jpah.10.5.750 · Cited by 316 · see citing works
Weiss, E., Miller, K., Mohan-Gibbons, H., & Vela, C. (2012) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani2020144 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ethical Concerns about Fashionable Dog Breeding
Menor-Campos, D. J. (2024) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani14050756 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
“In this scenario, commercial dog breeding, especially of fashionable breeds (those that become commercially most popular in a very short time), can lead to a breakdown in the human–dog bond, as dogs are treated as commodities rather than valued compan-ions [16].”
Background
- Authors
- Croney, C. C.
- Affiliations
- Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
- Corresponding author
- Croney, Candace C.
- ORCID
- Croney, Candace C.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Animal Ethics Research
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2019-08-22
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 230-252
- ISSN
- 2588-9559 (ISSN-L)
- 2588-9567
- OpenAlex
- W2921179460
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 17.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Animal Ethics Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Animal Law and Welfare
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Keywords
- purebred dogs, animal welfare, human-dog relationship, duty of care, animal welfare legislation, companion animals, ethics of animal use
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review