Cited by 30Indigenous Health, Education, and RightsAustralian Indigenous Culture and HistoryQualitative Research Methods and Ethics

Thought Ritual: An Indigenous Data Analysis Method for Research

Open access
Yunkaporta, Tyson, Moodie, Donna·2021·Indigenous Knowledges

Abstract

There is an absence of studies on discrete Indigenous data analysis methods in the literature on Indigenous research methodologies. However, data analysis is occasionally incorporated as an aspect of Indigenised research frameworks (, ) or, more often, follows emic academic techniques mediated by etic values and paradigms (; ; ; ). This chapter proposes a standalone Indigenous data analysis tool that is a hybridisation of ancient oral culture practice and contemporary thought experiment. It is grounded in Aboriginal protocols of communal knowledge production that are aligned with principles of complexity theory. This analysis tool represents a significant departure from western academic approaches, while promoting high levels of intellectual rigour. It also offers the intriguing possibility of examining non-Indigenous data sets using an Indigenous Knowledge process, potentially resolving the issue described by of quantitative data being, to date, largely ignored in Indigenous research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1163/9789004461642_006

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [1][1] Zaccone, Sophie, Jamieson, Graham, Murray, Clara, Lock, Mark J, and Doyle, David, 2022, "Recasting Jung through an Indigenist approach to deepening shared knowledges of wellbeing and healing on Australian soils: a qualitative Landscape Research study protocol (Preprint)" JMIR Research Protocols 1929-0748 Go to this article
  2. [2][2] Tynan, Lauren and Bishop, Michelle, 2023, "Decolonizing the Literature Review: A Relational Approach" Qualitative Inquiry Vol. 29, No. 3-4, pp 498, 1552-7565 Go to this article

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yunkaporta, T., & Moodie, D.
Venue
Indigenous Knowledges
Publisher
BRILL
Published
2021-02-08
Pages
87-96
OpenAlex
W3133817328
Cited by
30
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4
FWCI
12.40
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Locations
BRILL eBooks (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Australian Indigenous Culture and History
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Keywords
Indigenous research methodologies, thought experiments, orality, community knowledge, complexity theory, indigenous knowledge, quantitative data analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review