Cited by 23Biblical Studies and InterpretationAncient Near East HistoryAncient Egypt and Archaeology

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Chronology of the Kings of Israel and Judah

Galil, Gershon·1996·BRILL eBooks

Abstract

This pioneering study wrestles with the perpetual problem of chronology in the Books of Kings. Starting from the conservative assumptions that the courts of Israel and Judah maintained regnal records, and that these for the most part accurately reflect regnal length, the author arrives at a new and persuasive dating for the reigns and their synchronisms. In addition, his chronological scheme includes all points of contact between Israel and Judah and external powers, especially Assyria. The result is one of the most responsible and yet most critical chronologies proposed to date, and will be the standard chronological reference for the next decade, if not longer.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1163/9789004667815

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Galil, G.
Corresponding author
Galil, Gershon
Venue
BRILL eBooks
Publisher
BRILL
Published
1996-01-01
OpenAlex
W4381995677
Cited by
23
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.69
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
BRILL eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Ancient Near East History
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
Keywords
chronology, Books of Kings, kings of Israel, kings of Judah, synchronism, Assyria, ancient Near East

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review