Mapping and interpreting cultural differences around the world
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Political and cultural psychologists identify several categories of values that differ between conservatives and liberals: conservatives are high and liberals are low on conformity, uncertainty avoidance, maintenance of status quo, order and tradition, closedness about new ideas and ways, inequality of people, authoritarianism, dogmatism and rigidity in moral judgment, stereotyping, prejudice, and
“Political and cultural psychologists identify several categories of values that differ between conservatives and liberals - conservatives are high on each of the following and liberals are low: conformity, uncertainty avoidance, maintenance of status quo, order and tradition, closedness about new ideas and ways, inequality of people (both social inequality and economic inequality), authoritarian”
From Parasite-stress promotes in-group assortative sociality: The cases of strong family ties and heightened religiosity (2012) · cites this paper as Schwartz 2004
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pathogen prevalence predicts human cross-cultural variability in individualism/collectivism
Fincher, C. L., Thornhill, R., Murray, D. R., & Schaller, M. (2008) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2008.0094 · Cited by 1,014 · see citing works
Fincher, C. L., & Thornhill, R. (2012) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x11000021 · Cited by 526 · see citing works
Dimensions and Dynamics of National Culture: Synthesizing Hofstede With Inglehart
Beugelsdijk, S., & Welzel, C. (2018) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022022118798505 · Cited by 461 · see citing works
“Alternative frameworks and dimensions of national culture have appeared since, such as the Globe study (House, Hanges, Javidan, Dorfman, & Gupta, 2004) and most notably the Schwartz Personal Values Inventory (Schwartz, 1994, 2004).”
BackgroundAgostini, M., & van Zomeren, M. (2021) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000256 · Cited by 301 · see citing works
Thornhill, R., Fincher, C. L., Murray, D. R., & Schaller, M. (2010) · Evolutionary Psychology · doi:10.1177/147470491000800201 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Becker, M., Vignoles, V. L., Owe, E., Brown, R., Smith, P. B., Easterbrook, M., Herman, G., de Sauvage, I., Bourguignon, D., Torres, A., et al. (2012) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0026853 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Does the Job Satisfaction—Job Performance Relationship Vary Across Cultures?
Ng, T. W. H., Sorensen, K. L., & Yim, F. H. K. (2009) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022022109339208 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Tartakovsky, E. (2016) · Psychotherapy Research · doi:10.1080/10503307.2014.989289 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
- Authors
- Schwartz, S. H.
- Affiliations
- National Research University Higher School of Economics (RU)
- Corresponding author
- Schwartz, Shalom H.
- ORCID
- Schwartz, Shalom H.
- Venue
- Comparing Cultures
- Publisher
- BRILL
- Published
- 2004-01-01
- Pages
- 43-73
- OpenAlex
- W158365607
- Cited by
- 761
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 26 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 52 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 68 · 2012: 47
- FWCI
- 33.73
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- BRILL eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Cross-Cultural and Social Analysis
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Global and Cross-Cultural Management
- Keywords
- cultural differences, cross-cultural comparison, cultural mapping, cultural interpretation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
