Cited by 1,014Cultural Differences and ValuesEvolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorCulture, Economy, and Development Studies

Pathogen prevalence predicts human cross-cultural variability in individualism/collectivism

Open access
Fincher, Corey L, Thornhill, Randy, Murray, Damian R, Schaller, Mark·2008·Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences

Abstract

Pathogenic diseases impose selection pressures on the social behaviour of host populations. In humans (Homo sapiens), many psychological phenomena appear to serve an antipathogen defence function. One broad implication is the existence of cross-cultural differences in human cognition and behaviour contingent upon the relative presence of pathogens in the local ecology. We focus specifically on one fundamental cultural variable: differences in individualistic versus collectivist values. We suggest that specific behavioural manifestations of collectivism (e.g. ethnocentrism, conformity) can inhibit the transmission of pathogens; and so we hypothesize that collectivism (compared with individualism) will more often characterize cultures in regions that have historically had higher prevalence of pathogens. Drawing on epidemiological data and the findings of worldwide cross-national surveys of individualism/collectivism, our results support this hypothesis: the regional prevalence of pathogens has a strong positive correlation with cultural indicators of collectivism and a strong negative correlation with individualism. The correlations remain significant even when controlling for potential confounding variables. These results help to explain the origin of a paradigmatic cross-cultural difference, and reveal previously undocumented consequences of pathogenic diseases on the variable nature of human societies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rspb.2008.0094

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In countries and cultures with historically higher parasite prevalence, people are less individualistic, exhibit lower openness, are more likely to conform, and more strongly endorse binding moral values.

    “in countries and cultures characterized by historically higher prevalence of parasitic diseases, people are less individualistic, exhibit lower levels of dispositional openness to new things, are more likely to conform to majority opinion, and more strongly endorse “binding” moral values that emphasize group loyalty, obedience, and respect for authority [15], [16], [17], [18], [19].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Gupta V, Hanges P.J. Regional and climate clustering of societal cultures. In: House R.J, Hanges P.J, Javidan M, Dorfman P.W, Gupta V, editors. Culture, leadership, and organizations: the GLOBE study of 62 societies. Sage Publications; Thousand Oaks, CA: 2004. pp. 178–218. [Google Scholar]
  2. Heine S.J. Norton; New York, NY: 2008. Cultural psychology. [Google Scholar]
  3. Hofstede G. Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. 2nd edn. Sage Publications; Thousand Oaks, CA: 2001. Culture's consequences. [Google Scholar]
  4. Murdock G.P. MacMillan; New York, NY: 1949. Social structure. [Google Scholar]
  5. Simmons J.S, Whayne T.F, Anderson G.W, Horack H.M. J. B. Lippincott; Philadelphia, PA: 1944. Global epidemiology. [Google Scholar]
  6. Triandis H.C. Westview Press; Boulder, CO: 1995. Individualism & collectivism. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fincher, C. L., Thornhill, R., Murray, D. R., & Schaller, M.
Affiliations
  • University of New Mexico (US)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
Fincher, Corey L
Venue
Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
Published
2008-02-26
Volume
275
Issue
1640
Pages
1279-1285
ISSN
  • 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
  • 0962-8452
  • 1471-2954
OpenAlex
W2150231411
Cited by
1,014
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 85 · 2021: 135 · 2020: 121 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 75 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 50 · 2013: 56 · 2012: 30
FWCI
40.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of British Columbia
  • Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Culture, Economy, and Development Studies
Keywords
individualism-collectivism, pathogen prevalence, cross-cultural variation, cultural evolution, ethnocentrism, conformity, disease transmission, social behavior, cross-national survey
MeSH terms
Communicable Diseases, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Humans, Models, Biological, Models, Psychological, Social Behavior, Epidemiologic Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review