The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Analysis of Dose-Response Curves to Methacholine: An Approach Suitable for Population Studies
Abstract
Dose-response curves to methacholine were examined in 9 normal and 10 asthmatic volunteers to determine whether the relationship between dose and response can be adequately summarized by means of a single, continuous measure that is not censored at lower levels of bronchial responsiveness. Subjects underwent a standard methacholine challenge test. There was a strong linear relationship between percent decline FEV1 and cumulative dose methacholine. We summarized each dose-response curve by the slope of a line extending from the origin to the last data point obtained. This summary dose-response slope effectively separated asthmatic from normal subjects, and there was a greater than 3,000-fold difference between the least and most responsive subjects. There was a high degree of correlation between the dose-response slope determined by the standard methacholine challenge protocol and that determined by an abbreviated protocol currently being used to examine nonspecific airway responsiveness in a large, longitudinal study of aging. Among the participants of the latter study, there is a unimodal, skewed distribution of dose-response slope. Dose-response slope is proposed as a quantitative measure of nonspecific airway responsiveness that avoids censoring and that may be particularly useful in epidemiologic studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Reddel, H. K., Taylor, D. R., Bateman, E. D., Boulet, L.-P., Boushey, H. A., Busse, W. W., Casale, T. B., Chanez, P., Enright, P. L., Gibson, P. G., et al. (2009) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.200801-060st · Cited by 1,918
Self-citationStandardized challenge testing with pharmacological, physical and sensitizing stimuli in adults
Sterk, P. J., Fabbri, L. M., Quanjer, P. H., Cockcroft, D. W., O'Byrne, P. M., Anderson, S. D., Juniper, E. F., & Malo, J.-L. (1993) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/09041950.053s1693 · Cited by 1,049
Predictive Markers of Asthma Exacerbation during Stepwise Dose Reduction of Inhaled Corticosteroids
LEUPPI, J. D., SALOME, C. M., JENKINS, C. R., ANDERSON, S. D., XUAN, W., MARKS, G. B., KOSKELA, H., BRANNAN, J. D., FREED, R., ANDERSSON, M., et al. (2001) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.163.2.9912091 · Cited by 332
PEAT, J. K., TOVEY, E., MELLIS, C. M., LEEDER, S. R., & WOOLCOCK, A. J. (1993) · Clinical & Experimental Allergy · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2222.1993.tb00258.x · Cited by 267
Exposure to house dust mite allergens and the clinical activity of asthma
Custovic, A., Taggart, S. C. O., Francis, H. C., Chapman, M. D., & Woodcock, A. (1996) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/s0091-6749(96)70227-0 · Cited by 251
Metadata
- Authors
- O'Connor, G., Sparrow, D., Taylor, D., Segal, M., Weiss, S., & Eleuteri, D.
- Venue
- American Review of Respiratory Disease
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1987-12
- Volume
- 136
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1412-1417
- ISSN
- 0003-0805 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2123247260
- Cited by
- 463
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysis of Dose-Response Curves to Methacholine: An Approach Suitable for Population Studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/ajrccm/136.6.1412
- The paper
- O'Connor, G., Sparrow, D., Taylor, D., Segal, M., Weiss, S., & Eleuteri, D. (1987). Analysis of Dose-Response Curves to Methacholine: An Approach Suitable for Population Studies. American Review of Respiratory Disease. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm/136.6.1412
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.