Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 332

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Predictive Markers of Asthma Exacerbation during Stepwise Dose Reduction of Inhaled Corticosteroids

LEUPPI, JÖRG D., SALOME, CHERYL M., JENKINS, CHRISTINE R., ANDERSON, SANDRA D., XUAN, WEI, MARKS, GUY B., KOSKELA, HEIKKI, BRANNAN, JOHN D., FREED, RUTH, ANDERSSON, MORGAN, CHAN, HAK-KIM, WOOLCOCK, ANN J.·2001·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

To determine predictors for failed reduction of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), in 50 subjects with well-controlled asthma (age 43.7 [18-69]; 22 males) taking a median dose of 1,000 microg ICS/d (100-3,600 microg/d), ICS were halved every 8 wk. Airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) to a bronchial provocation test (BPT) with histamine was measured at baseline. AHR to BPT with mannitol, spirometry, exhaled nitric oxide (eNO), and, in 31 subjects, sputum inflammatory cells were measured at baseline and at monthly intervals. Thirty-nine subjects suffered an asthma exacerbation. Seven subjects were successfully weaned off ICS. Using a Kaplan- Meier survival analysis, the significant predictors of a failure of ICS reduction were being hyperresponsive to both histamine and mannitol at baseline (p = 0.039), and being hyperresponsive to mannitol during the dose-reduction phase of the study (p = 0.02). Subjects older than 40 yr of age tended to be at greater risk of ICS reduction failure (p = 0.059). Response to mannitol and percentage sputum eosinophils were significantly greater before a failed ICS reduction than before the last successful ICS reduction, whereas there were no significant differences in symptoms, spirometry, or eNO. These findings suggest that documentation of patient's AHR or sputum eosinophils may be useful in guiding the reduction of ICS doses.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/ajrccm.163.2.9912091

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 28 references

Cited by

See all 332

Metadata

Authors
LEUPPI, J. D., SALOME, C. M., JENKINS, C. R., ANDERSON, S. D., XUAN, W., MARKS, G. B., KOSKELA, H., BRANNAN, J. D., FREED, R., ANDERSSON, M., CHAN, H.-K., & WOOLCOCK, A. J.
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2001-02-01
Volume
163
Issue
2
Pages
406-412
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W2023554026
Cited by
332
References
28
FWCI
9.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predictive Markers of Asthma Exacerbation during Stepwise Dose Reduction of Inhaled Corticosteroids. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/ajrccm.163.2.9912091
The paper
LEUPPI, J. D., SALOME, C. M., JENKINS, C. R., ANDERSON, S. D., XUAN, W., MARKS, G. B., KOSKELA, H., BRANNAN, J. D., FREED, R., ANDERSSON, M., CHAN, H.-K., & WOOLCOCK, A. J. (2001). Predictive Markers of Asthma Exacerbation during Stepwise Dose Reduction of Inhaled Corticosteroids. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.163.2.9912091

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.