The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Severe Community-acquired Pneumonia: Epidemiology and Prognostic Factors
Abstract
Over a period of 4 consecutive yr, 92 nonimmunosuppressed patients (21 women and 71 men aged 53 +/- 16 yr, means = SD) with critical acute respiratory failure (PaO2/FiO2, 209 +/- 9 mm Hg) caused by severe community-acquired pneumonia were admitted to the respiratory intensive care unit (RICU) of a general hospital. The most frequent underlying clinical condition was chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (44 patients, 48%). A total of 56 patients (61%) required mechanical ventilation for a mean period of 10.7 +/- 12.5 days, 29 of them (52%) needing PEEP (9.9 +/- 3.8 cm H2O). A group of 23 (25%) patients had criteria of adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). A causal microorganism was identified in 48 patients (52%), the two most frequent etiologies being Streptococcus pneumoniae (14, 15%) and Legionella pneumophila (13, 14%). Pseudomonas aeruginosa (5, 5%) was always associated with bronchiectasis. Mortality due to severe community-acquired pneumonia was 22% (20 patients). According to univariate analysis, mortality was associated with anticipated death within 4 to 5 yr, inadequate antibiotic treatment before RICU admission, mechanical ventilation requirements, use of PEEP, FIO2 greater than 0.6, coexistence of ARDS, radiographic spread of the pneumonia during RICU admission, septic shock, bacteremia, and P. aeruginosa as the cause of the pneumonia. Further, recursive partitioning analysis selected two factors significantly related to the prognosis: the radiographic spread of the pneumonia during RICU admission and the presence of septic shock.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Clinical Prediction Rules: Applications and Methodological Standards
Wasson, J. H., Sox, H. C., Neff, R. K., & Goldman, L. (1985) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198509263131306 · Cited by 1,357
Cited by
Martinez, J. A., Horcajada, J. P., Almela, M., Marco, F., Soriano, A., Garcia, E., Marco, M. A., Torres, A., & Mensa, J. (2003) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/367541 · Cited by 357
Self-citationCurrent and Emerging Legionella Diagnostics for Laboratory and Outbreak Investigations
Mercante, J. W., & Winchell, J. M. (2015) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00029-14 · Cited by 339
Epidemiology of Sepsis: Race, Sex, and Chronic Alcohol Abuse
Moss, M. (2005) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/432003 · Cited by 157
Metadata
- Authors
- Torres, A., Serra-Batlles, J., Ferrer, A., Jiménez, P., Celis, R., Cobo, E., & Rodriguez-Roisin, R.
- Venue
- American Review of Respiratory Disease
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1991-08
- Volume
- 144
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 312-318
- ISSN
- 0003-0805 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2005758646
- Cited by
- 613
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Severe Community-acquired Pneumonia: Epidemiology and Prognostic Factors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/ajrccm/144.2.312
- The paper
- Torres, A., Serra-Batlles, J., Ferrer, A., Jiménez, P., Celis, R., Cobo, E., & Rodriguez-Roisin, R. (1991). Severe Community-acquired Pneumonia: Epidemiology and Prognostic Factors. American Review of Respiratory Disease. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm/144.2.312
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.