Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 750

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Mepolizumab in Patients with Moderate Persistent Asthma

Flood-Page, Patrick, Swenson, Cheri, Faiferman, Isidore, Matthews, John, Williams, Michael, Brannick, Lesley, Robinson, Douglas, Wenzel, Sally, Busse, William, Hansel, Trevor T., Barnes, Neil C., on behalf of the International Mepolizumab Study Group·2007·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

RATIONALE: Accumulation of eosinophils in the bronchial mucosa of individuals with asthma is considered to be a central event in the pathogenesis of asthma. In animal models, airway eosinophil recruitment and airway hyperresponsiveness in response to allergen challenge are reduced by specific targeting of interleukin-5. A previous small dose-finding study found that mepolizumab, a humanized anti-interleukin-5 monoclonal antibody, had no effect on allergen challenge in humans. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of three intravenous infusions of mepolizumab, 250 or 750 mg at monthly intervals, on clinical outcome measures in 362 patients with asthma experiencing persistent symptoms despite inhaled corticosteroid therapy (400-1,000 mug of beclomethasone or equivalent). METHODS: Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Morning peak expiratory flow, forced expiratory volume in 1 second, daily beta(2)-agonist use, symptom scores, exacerbation rates, and quality of life measures. Sputum eosinophil levels were also measured in a subgroup of 37 individuals. Mepolizumab was associated with a significant reduction in blood and sputum eosinophils in both treatment groups (blood, P < 0.001 for both doses; sputum, P = 0.006 for 250 mg and P = 0.004 for 750 mg). There were no statistically significant changes in any of the clinical end points measured. There was a nonsignificant trend for decrease in exacerbation rates in the mepolizumab 750-mg treatment group (P = 0.065). CONCLUSIONS: Mepolizumab treatment does not appear to add significant clinical benefit in patients with asthma with persistent symptoms despite inhaled corticosteroid therapy. Further studies are needed to investigate the effect of mepolizumab on exacerbation rates, using protocols specifically tailored to patients with asthma with persistent airway eosinophilia.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/rccm.200701-085oc

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 750

Metadata

Authors
Flood-Page, P., Swenson, C., Faiferman, I., Matthews, J., Williams, M., Brannick, L., Robinson, D., Wenzel, S., Busse, W., Hansel, T. T., Barnes, N. C., & on behalf of the International Mepolizumab Study Group
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2007-12-01
Volume
176
Issue
11
Pages
1062-1071
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W1994585625
Cited by
750
References
0
FWCI
23.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Mepolizumab in Patients with Moderate Persistent Asthma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/rccm.200701-085oc
The paper
Flood-Page, P., Swenson, C., Faiferman, I., Matthews, J., Williams, M., Brannick, L., Robinson, D., Wenzel, S., Busse, W., Hansel, T. T., Barnes, N. C., & on behalf of the International Mepolizumab Study Group. (2007). A Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Mepolizumab in Patients with Moderate Persistent Asthma. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200701-085oc

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.