Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 777

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Lung Stress and Strain during Mechanical Ventilation for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Open access
Chiumello, Davide, Carlesso, Eleonora, Cadringher, Paolo, Caironi, Pietro, Valenza, Franco, Polli, Federico, Tallarini, Federica, Cozzi, Paola, Cressoni, Massimo, Colombo, Angelo, Marini, John J., Gattinoni, Luciano·2008·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

RATIONALE: Lung injury caused by a ventilator results from nonphysiologic lung stress (transpulmonary pressure) and strain (inflated volume to functional residual capacity ratio). OBJECTIVES: To determine whether plateau pressure and tidal volume are adequate surrogates for stress and strain, and to quantify the stress to strain relationship in patients and control subjects. METHODS: Nineteen postsurgical healthy patients (group 1), 11 patients with medical diseases (group 2), 26 patients with acute lung injury (group 3), and 24 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (group 4) underwent a positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) trial (5 and 15 cm H2O) with 6, 8, 10, and 12 ml/kg tidal volume. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Plateau airway pressure, lung and chest wall elastances, and lung stress and strain significantly increased from groups 1 to 4 and with increasing PEEP and tidal volume. Within each group, a given applied airway pressure produced largely variable stress due to the variability of the lung elastance to respiratory system elastance ratio (range, 0.33-0.95). Analogously, for the same applied tidal volume, the strain variability within subgroups was remarkable, due to the functional residual capacity variability. Therefore, low or high tidal volume, such as 6 and 12 ml/kg, respectively, could produce similar stress and strain in a remarkable fraction of patients in each subgroup. In contrast, the stress to strain ratio-that is, specific lung elastance-was similar throughout the subgroups (13.4 +/- 3.4, 12.6 +/- 3.0, 14.4 +/- 3.6, and 13.5 +/- 4.1 cm H2O for groups 1 through 4, respectively; P = 0.58) and did not change with PEEP and tidal volume. CONCLUSIONS: Plateau pressure and tidal volume are inadequate surrogates for lung stress and strain. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 00143468).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/rccm.200710-1589oc

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 777

Metadata

Authors
Chiumello, D., Carlesso, E., Cadringher, P., Caironi, P., Valenza, F., Polli, F., Tallarini, F., Cozzi, P., Cressoni, M., Colombo, A., Marini, J. J., & Gattinoni, L.
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2008-08-15
Volume
178
Issue
4
Pages
346-355
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W2167718580
Cited by
777
References
4
FWCI
30.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lung Stress and Strain during Mechanical Ventilation for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/rccm.200710-1589oc
The paper
Chiumello, D., Carlesso, E., Cadringher, P., Caironi, P., Valenza, F., Polli, F., Tallarini, F., Cozzi, P., Cressoni, M., Colombo, A., Marini, J. J., & Gattinoni, L. (2008). Lung Stress and Strain during Mechanical Ventilation for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200710-1589oc

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.