Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 346

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Lung Stress and Strain during Mechanical Ventilation: Any Safe Threshold?

Protti, Alessandro, Cressoni, Massimo, Santini, Alessandro, Langer, Thomas, Mietto, Cristina, Febres, Daniela, Chierichetti, Monica, Coppola, Silvia, Conte, Grazia, Gatti, Stefano, Leopardi, Orazio, Masson, Serge, Lombardi, Luciano, Lazzerini, Marco, Rampoldi, Erica, Cadringher, Paolo, Gattinoni, Luciano·2011·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

RATIONALE: Unphysiologic strain (the ratio between tidal volume and functional residual capacity) and stress (the transpulmonary pressure) can cause ventilator-induced lung damage. OBJECTIVES: To identify a strain-stress threshold (if any) above which ventilator-induced lung damage can occur. METHODS: Twenty-nine healthy pigs were mechanically ventilated for 54 hours with a tidal volume producing a strain between 0.45 and 3.30. Ventilator-induced lung damage was defined as net increase in lung weight. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Initial lung weight and functional residual capacity were measured with computed tomography. Final lung weight was measured using a balance. After setting tidal volume, data collection included respiratory system mechanics, gas exchange and hemodynamics (every 6 h); cytokine levels in serum (every 12 h) and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (end of the experiment); and blood laboratory examination (start and end of the experiment). Two clusters of animals could be clearly identified: animals that increased their lung weight (n = 14) and those that did not (n = 15). Tidal volume was 38 ± 9 ml/kg in the former and 22 ± 8 ml/kg in the latter group, corresponding to a strain of 2.16 ± 0.58 and 1.29 ± 0.57 and a stress of 13 ± 5 and 8 ± 3 cm H(2)O, respectively. Lung weight gain was associated with deterioration in respiratory system mechanics, gas exchange, and hemodynamics, pulmonary and systemic inflammation and multiple organ dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: In healthy pigs, ventilator-induced lung damage develops only when a strain greater than 1.5-2 is reached or overcome. Because of differences in intrinsic lung properties, caution is warranted in translating these findings to humans.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/rccm.201010-1757oc

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Cited by

See all 346

Metadata

Authors
Protti, A., Cressoni, M., Santini, A., Langer, T., Mietto, C., Febres, D., Chierichetti, M., Coppola, S., Conte, G., Gatti, S., Leopardi, O., Masson, S., Lombardi, L., Lazzerini, M., Rampoldi, E., Cadringher, P., & Gattinoni, L.
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2011-05-15
Volume
183
Issue
10
Pages
1354-1362
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W2122768693
Cited by
346
References
22
FWCI
17.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lung Stress and Strain during Mechanical Ventilation: Any Safe Threshold? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/rccm.201010-1757oc
The paper
Protti, A., Cressoni, M., Santini, A., Langer, T., Mietto, C., Febres, D., Chierichetti, M., Coppola, S., Conte, G., Gatti, S., Leopardi, O., Masson, S., Lombardi, L., Lazzerini, M., Rampoldi, E., Cadringher, P., & Gattinoni, L. (2011). Lung Stress and Strain during Mechanical Ventilation: Any Safe Threshold? American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201010-1757oc

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.