Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 256

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparison of Medical Admissions to Intensive Care Units in the United States and United Kingdom

Wunsch, Hannah, Angus, Derek C., Harrison, David A., Linde-Zwirble, Walter T., Rowan, Kathryn M.·2011·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

RATIONALE: The United States has seven times as many intensive care unit (ICU) beds per capita as the United Kingdom; the effect on care of critically ill patients is unknown. OBJECTIVES: To compare medical ICU admissions in the United States and United Kingdom. METHODS: Retrospective (2002-2004) cohort study of 172,785 ICU admissions (137 United States ICUs, Project IMPACT database; 160 United Kingdom ICUs, Case Mix Program) with patients followed until initial hospital discharge. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: United Kingdom (vs. United States) admissions were less likely to be admitted directly from the emergency room (ER) (33.4% vs. 58%); had longer hospital stays before ICU admission (mean days 2.6 ± 8.2 vs. 1 ± 3.6); and fewer were greater than or equal to 85 years (3.2% vs. 7.8%). United Kingdom patients were more frequently mechanically ventilated within 24 hours after ICU admission (68% vs. 27.4%); were sicker (mean Acute Physiology Score 16.7 ± 7.6 vs. 10.6 ± 6.8); and had higher primary hospital mortality (38% vs. 15.9%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.73; 95% confidence interval, 1.50-1.99). There was no mortality difference for mechanically ventilated patients admitted from the ER (adjusted odds ratio, 1.09; 95% confidence interval, 0.89-1.33). Comparisons of hospital mortality were confounded by differences in case mix; hospital length of stay (United Kingdom median 10 d [interquartile range {IQR}, 3-24] vs. United States 6 d [IQR, 3-11]; and discharge practices (more United States patients were discharged to skilled care facilities [29% of survivors vs. 6% in the United Kingdom]). CONCLUSIONS: Lower United Kingdom ICU bed availability is associated with fewer direct admissions from the ER, longer hospital stays before ICU admission, and higher severity of illness. Interpretation of between-country hospital outcomes is confounded by differences in case mix, processes of care, and discharge practices.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/rccm.201012-1961oc

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 27 references

Cited by

See all 256

Metadata

Authors
Wunsch, H., Angus, D. C., Harrison, D. A., Linde-Zwirble, W. T., & Rowan, K. M.
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2011-06-15
Volume
183
Issue
12
Pages
1666-1673
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W2117187812
Cited by
256
References
27
FWCI
13.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of Medical Admissions to Intensive Care Units in the United States and United Kingdom. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/rccm.201012-1961oc
The paper
Wunsch, H., Angus, D. C., Harrison, D. A., Linde-Zwirble, W. T., & Rowan, K. M. (2011). Comparison of Medical Admissions to Intensive Care Units in the United States and United Kingdom. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201012-1961oc

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.