Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 294

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Combination Biomarkers to Diagnose Sepsis in the Critically Ill Patient

Gibot, Sébastien, Béné, Marie C., Noel, Robin, Massin, Frédéric, Guy, Julien, Cravoisy, Aurélie, Barraud, Damien, De Carvalho Bittencourt, Marcelo, Quenot, Jean-Pierre, Bollaert, Pierre-Edouard, Faure, Gilbert, Charles, Pierre-Emmanuel·2012·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

RATIONALE: Although the outcome of sepsis benefits from the prompt administration of appropriate antibiotics on correct diagnosis, the assessment of infection in critically ill patients is often a challenge for clinicians. In this setting, simple biomarkers, especially when used in combination, could prove useful. OBJECTIVES: To determine the usefulness of combination biomarkers to diagnose sepsis. METHODS: Three hundred consecutive patients were enrolled to construct a biologic score that was next validated in an independent prospective cohort of 79 critically ill patients from another center. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: Plasma concentrations of soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1 (sTREM-1) and procalcitonin (PCT) were assayed, and the expression of the high-affinity immunoglobulin-Fc fragment receptor I (FcγRI) CD64 on neutrophils (polymorphonuclear [PMN] CD64 index) in flow cytometry was measured. A "bioscore" combining these biomarkers was constructed. Serum concentrations of PCT and sTREM-1 and the PMN CD64 index were higher in patients with sepsis compared with all others (P < 0.001 for the three markers). These biomarkers were all independent predictors of infection, the best receiver-operating characteristic curve being obtained for the PMN CD64 index. The performance of the bioscore, better than that of each individual biomarker, was externally confirmed in the validation cohort. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective study, including inceptive and validation cohorts of unselected intensive care unit patients, demonstrates the high performance of a bioscore combining the PMN CD64 index together with PCT and sTREM-1 serum levels in diagnosing sepsis in the critically ill patient.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/rccm.201201-0037oc

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 30 references

Cited by

See all 294

Metadata

Authors
Gibot, S., Béné, M. C., Noel, R., Massin, F., Guy, J., Cravoisy, A., Barraud, D., De Carvalho Bittencourt, M., Quenot, J.-P., Bollaert, P.-E., Faure, G., & Charles, P.-E.
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2012-07-01
Volume
186
Issue
1
Pages
65-71
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W2107912229
Cited by
294
References
30
FWCI
21.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Combination Biomarkers to Diagnose Sepsis in the Critically Ill Patient. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/rccm.201201-0037oc
The paper
Gibot, S., Béné, M. C., Noel, R., Massin, F., Guy, J., Cravoisy, A., Barraud, D., De Carvalho Bittencourt, M., Quenot, J.-P., Bollaert, P.-E., Faure, G., & Charles, P.-E. (2012). Combination Biomarkers to Diagnose Sepsis in the Critically Ill Patient. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201201-0037oc

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.