Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 942

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clinical Features of 85 Fatal Cases of COVID-19 from Wuhan. A Retrospective Observational Study

Open access
Du, Yingzhen, Tu, Lei, Zhu, Pingjun, Mu, Mi, Wang, Runsheng, Yang, Pengcheng, Wang, Xi, Hu, Chao, Ping, Rongyu, Hu, Peng, Li, Tianzhi, Cao, Feng, Chang, Christopher, Hu, Qinyong, Jin, Yang, Xu, Guogang·2020·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

Abstract Rationale The global death toll from coronavirus disease (COVID-19) virus as of May 12, 2020, exceeds 286,000. The risk factors for death were attributed to advanced age and comorbidities but have not been accurately defined. Objectives To report the clinical features of 85 fatal cases of COVID-19 in two hospitals in Wuhan. Methods Medical records were collected of 85 fatal cases of COVID-19 between January 9, 2020, and February 15, 2020. Information recorded included medical history, exposure history, comorbidities, symptoms, signs, laboratory findings, computed tomographic scans, and clinical management. Measurements and Main Results The median age of the patients was 65.8 years, and 72.9% were male. Common symptoms were fever (78 [91.8%]), shortness of breath (50 [58.8%]), fatigue (50 [58.8%]), and dyspnea (60 [70.6%]). Hypertension, diabetes, and coronary heart disease were the most common comorbidities. Notably, 81.2% of patients had very low eosinophil counts on admission. Complications included respiratory failure (80 [94.1%]), shock (69 [81.2%]), acute respiratory distress syndrome (63 [74.1%]), and arrhythmia (51 [60%]), among others. Most patients received antibiotic (77 [90.6%]), antiviral (78 [91.8%]), and glucocorticoid (65 [76.5%]) treatments. A total of 38 (44.7%) and 33 (38.8%) patients received intravenous immunoglobulin and IFN-α2b, respectively. Conclusions In this depictive study of 85 fatal cases of COVID-19, most cases were males aged over 50 years with noncommunicable chronic diseases. The majority of the patients died of multiple organ failure. Early onset of shortness of breath may be used as an observational symptom for COVID-19 exacerbations. Eosinophilopenia may indicate a poor prognosis. A combination of antimicrobial drugs did not offer considerable benefit to the outcome of this group of patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/rccm.202003-0543oc

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 942

Metadata

Authors
Du, Y., Tu, L., Zhu, P., Mu, M., Wang, R., Yang, P., Wang, X., Hu, C., Ping, R., Hu, P., Li, T., Cao, F., Chang, C., Hu, Q., Jin, Y., & Xu, G.
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2020-06-01
Volume
201
Issue
11
Pages
1372-1379
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W3012195391
Cited by
942
References
5
FWCI
26.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical Features of 85 Fatal Cases of COVID-19 from Wuhan. A Retrospective Observational Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/rccm.202003-0543oc
The paper
Du, Y., Tu, L., Zhu, P., Mu, M., Wang, R., Yang, P., Wang, X., Hu, C., Ping, R., Hu, P., Li, T., Cao, F., Chang, C., Hu, Q., Jin, Y., & Xu, G. (2020). Clinical Features of 85 Fatal Cases of COVID-19 from Wuhan. A Retrospective Observational Study. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202003-0543oc

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.