Cited by 464COVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchLong-Term Effects of COVID-19

Ruxolitinib in treatment of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a multicenter, single-blind, randomized controlled trial

Open access
Cao, Yang, Wei, Jia, Zou, Liang, Jiang, Tiebin, Wang, Gaoxiang, Chen, Liting, Huang, Liang, Meng, Fankai +13 more·2020·Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology

Abstract

Background Accumulating evidence proposed Janus-associated kinase (JAK) inhibitors as therapeutic targets warranting rapid investigation.Objective This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib, a JAK1/2 inhibitor, for coronavirus disease 2019.Methods We conducted a prospective, multicenter, single-blind, randomized controlled phase II trial involving patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019.Results Forty-three patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive ruxolitinib plus standard-of-care treatment (22 patients) or placebo based on standard-of-care treatment (21 patients). After exclusion of 2 patients (1 ineligible, 1 consent withdrawn) from the ruxolitinib group, 20 patients in the intervention group and 21 patients in the control group were included in the study. Treatment with ruxolitinib plus standard-of-care was not associated with significantly accelerated clinical improvement in severe patients with coronavirus disease 2019, although ruxolitinib recipients had a numerically faster clinical improvement. Eighteen (90%) patients from the ruxolitinib group showed computed tomography improvement at day 14 compared with 13 (61.9%) patients from the control group (P = .0495). Three patients in the control group died of respiratory failure, with 14.3% overall mortality at day 28; no patients died in the ruxolitinib group. Ruxolitinib was well tolerated with low toxicities and no new safety signals. Levels of 7 cytokines were significantly decreased in the ruxolitinib group in comparison to the control group.Conclusions Although no statistical difference was observed, ruxolitinib recipients had a numerically faster clinical improvement. Significant chest computed tomography improvement, a faster recovery from lymphopenia, and favorable side-effect profile in the ruxolitinib group were encouraging and informative to future trials to test efficacy of ruxolitinib in a larger population.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.05.019

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ruxolitinib failed to show significant protection in the treatment of severe coronavirus disease.

    “However, ruxolitinib failed to show significant protection in the treatment of severe coronavirus disease (57) and the National Institutes of Health recommends against using ruxolitinib for the treatment of COVID-19 (https://bit.ly/3TtgsIe).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cao, Y., Wei, J., Zou, L., Jiang, T., Wang, G., Chen, L., Huang, L., Meng, F., Huang, L., Wang, N., Zhou, X., Luo, H., Mao, Z., Chen, X., Xie, J., Liu, J., Cheng, H., Zhao, J., Huang, G., Wang, W., & Zhou, J.
Affiliations
  • Tongji Hospital (CN)
  • Wuhan No.1 Hospital (CN)
  • Third Xiangya Hospital (CN)
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
  • Huang, Gang
  • Wang, Wei
  • Zhou, Jianfeng
Venue
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-07
Volume
146
Issue
1
Pages
137-146.e3
ISSN
0091-6749 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3030158388
Cited by
456
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 95 · 2021: 178 · 2020: 103
FWCI
14.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Emergency Research Project of Tongji Hospital
  • Emergency Research Project of Tongji Hospital of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (2020kfyXGYJ045)
  • Emergency Research Project of Hubei province (2020FCA006)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
Keywords
ruxolitinib, COVID-19 pandemic, severe COVID-19, JAK1/2 inhibitor, JAK inhibitors, cytokine levels, mortality, drug safety, antiviral therapy
MeSH terms
Betacoronavirus, Janus Kinase Inhibitors, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Drug Treatment, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nitriles, Pneumonia, Viral, Pyrazoles, Pyrimidines, Single-Blind Method, Treatment Outcome, Coronavirus Infections, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review