The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Influence of Engineered Nanoparticles from Metals on the Blood-Brain Barrier Permeability, Cerebral Blood Flow, Brain Edema and Neurotoxicity. An Experimental Study in the Rat and Mice Using Biochemical and Morphological Approaches
Abstract
Influence of nanoparticles on brain function following in vivo exposures is not well known. Depending on the magnitude and intensity of nanoparticle exposure from the environment, food and/or water source, neuronal function could be affected and may lead to neurotoxicity and neuropathology. This hypothesis was examined in present investigation using systemic or intracerebroventricular administration of engineered nanoparticles from metals, i.e., Al, Ag and Cu (approximately equal to 50 to 60 nm) on neurotoxicity in rats and mice. Intraperitoneal (50 mg/kg), intravenous (30 mg/kg), intracarotid (2.5 mg/kg) or intracerebroventricular administration (20 microg) of nanoparticles significantly altered the blood-brain barrier (BBB) function to Evans blue and radioiodine in several regions of the brain and spinal cord at 24 h after their administration. Marked decreases in local cerebral blood flow (CBF) and pronounced brain edema was seen in regional areas associated with BBB leakage. Neuronal cell injuries, glial cell activation, heat shock protein (HSP) upregulation and loss of myelinated fibers are quite common in effected brain areas. The observed pathological changes were most pronounced in mice compared to rats. Exposures to Cu and Ag nanoparticles showed most marked effects on brain pathology when administered into systemic circulation or into the brain ventricular spaces as compared to Al nanoparticles. Our results are the first to show that nanoparticles from metals are able to induce selective and specific neurotoxicity that depends on the type of metals, route of administration and the species used.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Trickler, W. J., Lantz, S. M., Murdock, R. C., Schrand, A. M., Robinson, B. L., Newport, G. D., Schlager, J. J., Oldenburg, S. J., Paule, M. G., Slikker, W., et al. (2010) · Toxicological Sciences · doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfq244 · Cited by 346
Self-citationNeurodegenerative and neurological disorders by small inhaled particles
Heusinkveld, H. J., Wahle, T., Campbell, A., Westerink, R. H. S., Tran, L., Johnston, H., Stone, V., Cassee, F. R., & Schins, R. P. F. (2016) · NeuroToxicology · doi:10.1016/j.neuro.2016.07.007 · Cited by 331
Breaking Down the Barriers to Precision Cancer Nanomedicine
von Roemeling, C., Jiang, W., Chan, C. K., Weissman, I. L., & Kim, B. Y. S. (2017) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.07.006 · Cited by 330
Dendrimer-Based Drug Delivery Systems for Brain Targeting
Zhu, Y., Liu, C., & Pang, Z. (2019) · Biomolecules · doi:10.3390/biom9120790 · Cited by 220
Engineered nanoparticles, How brain friendly is this new guest?
Cupaioli, F. A., Zucca, F. A., Boraschi, D., & Zecca, L. (2014) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2014.05.002 · Cited by 139
Metadata
- Authors
- Sharma, H. S., Ali, S. F., Hussain, S. M., Schlager, J. J., & Sharma, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology
- Publisher
- American Scientific Publishers
- Published
- 2009-08-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 5055-5072
- ISSN
- 1533-4880 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2033568399
- Cited by
- 188
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Influence of Engineered Nanoparticles from Metals on the Blood-Brain Barrier Permeability, Cerebral Blood Flow, Brain Edema and Neurotoxicity. An Experimental Study in the Rat and Mice Using Biochemical and Morphological Approaches. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1166/jnn.2009.gr09
- The paper
- Sharma, H. S., Ali, S. F., Hussain, S. M., Schlager, J. J., & Sharma, A. (2009). Influence of Engineered Nanoparticles from Metals on the Blood-Brain Barrier Permeability, Cerebral Blood Flow, Brain Edema and Neurotoxicity. An Experimental Study in the Rat and Mice Using Biochemical and Morphological Approaches. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2009.gr09
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.