The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Representational dynamics of object vision: The first 1000 ms
Open accessAbstract
Human object recognition is remarkably efficient. In recent years, significant advancements have been made in our understanding of how the brain represents visual objects and organizes them into categories. Recent studies using pattern analyses methods have characterized a representational space of objects in human and primate inferior temporal cortex in which object exemplars are discriminable and cluster according to category (e.g., faces and bodies). In the present study we examined how category structure in object representations emerges in the first 1000 ms of visual processing. In the study, participants viewed 24 object exemplars with a planned categorical structure comprised of four levels ranging from highly specific (individual exemplars) to highly abstract (animate vs. inanimate), while their brain activity was recorded with magnetoencephalography (MEG). We used a sliding time window decoding approach to decode the exemplar and the exemplar's category that participants were viewing on a moment-to-moment basis. We found exemplar and category membership could be decoded from the neuromagnetic recordings shortly after stimulus onset (<100 ms) with peak decodability following thereafter. Latencies for peak decodability varied systematically with the level of category abstraction with more abstract categories emerging later, indicating that the brain hierarchically constructs category representations. In addition, we examined the stationarity of patterns of activity in the brain that encode object category information and show these patterns vary over time, suggesting the brain might use flexible time varying codes to represent visual object categories.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2012) · Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_5195 · Cited by 19,370
The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception
Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J., & Chun, M. M. (1997) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.17-11-04302.1997 · Cited by 7,738
Basic objects in natural categories
Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(76)90013-x · Cited by 5,643
Distributed and overlapping representations of faces and objects in ventral temporal cortex
Haxby, J. V., Gobbini, M. I., Furey, M. L., Ishai, A., Schouten, J. L., & Pietrini, P. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1063736 · Cited by 3,940
Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex
Riesenhuber, M., & Poggio, T. (1999) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/14819 · Cited by 3,309
Electrophysiological Studies of Face Perception in Humans
Bentin, S., Allison, T., Puce, A., Perez, E., & McCarthy, G. (1996) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.1996.8.6.551 · Cited by 3,076
A cortical representation of the local visual environment
Epstein, R., & Kanwisher, N. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/33402 · Cited by 2,984
Torgerson, W. S. (1958) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,920
Étude comparative de la distribution florale dans une portion des Alpes et du Jura
Jaccard, P. (1901) · E-Periodica · doi:10.5169/seals-266450 · Cited by 2,353
A cortical area selective for visual processing of the human body
Downing, P. E., Jiang, Y., Shuman, M., & Kanwisher, N. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1063414 · Cited by 2,043
Cited by
Deep supervised, but not unsupervised, models may explain IT cortical representation
Khaligh-Razavi, S.-M., & Kriegeskorte, N. (2014) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003915 · Cited by 1,204
Self-citationKriegeskorte, N. (2015) · Annual Review of Vision Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-vision-082114-035447 · Cited by 1,093
Self-citationA Toolbox for Representational Similarity Analysis
Nili, H., Wingfield, C., Walther, A., Su, L., Marslen-Wilson, W., & Kriegeskorte, N. (2014) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003553 · Cited by 937
Self-citationRepresentational geometry: integrating cognition, computation, and the brain
Kriegeskorte, N., & Kievit, R. A. (2013) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.06.007 · Cited by 911
Self-citationRecurrence is required to capture the representational dynamics of the human visual system
Kietzmann, T. C., Spoerer, C. J., Sörensen, L. K. A., Cichy, R. M., Hauk, O., & Kriegeskorte, N. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1905544116 · Cited by 406
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Carlson, T., Tovar, D. A., Alink, A., & Kriegeskorte, N.
- Venue
- Journal of Vision
- Published
- 2013-08-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1-1
- ISSN
- 1534-7362 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2148073157
- Cited by
- 414
- References
- 52
- FWCI
- 13.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Representational dynamics of object vision: The first 1000 ms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1167/13.10.1
- The paper
- Carlson, T., Tovar, D. A., Alink, A., & Kriegeskorte, N. (2013). Representational dynamics of object vision: The first 1000 ms. Journal of Vision. https://doi.org/10.1167/13.10.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.