Cited by 1,093Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsVisual perception and processing mechanismsNeural Networks and Applications

Deep neural networks: a new framework for modeling biological vision and brain information processing

Open access
Kriegeskorte, Nikolaus·2015·Annual Review of Vision Science

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Recent advances in neural network modeling have enabled major strides in computer vision and other artificial intelligence applications. Human-level visual recognition abilities are coming within reach of artificial systems. Artificial neural networks are inspired by the brain, and their computations could be implemented in biological neurons. Convolutional feedforward networks, which now dominate computer vision, take further inspiration from the architecture of the primate visual hierarchy. However, the current models are designed with engineering goals, not to model brain computations. Nevertheless, initial studies comparing internal representations between these models and primate brains find surprisingly similar representational spaces. With human-level performance no longer out of reach, we are entering an exciting new era, in which we will be able to build biologically faithful feedforward and recurrent computational models of how biological brains perform high-level feats of intelligence, including vision.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-vision-082114-035447

Cites

112 of 112 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is evidence that the perceptual representation spaces learned by current DNNs already closely resemble those of the human visual system, so their corresponding quality spaces might already be substantially aligned.

    “In fact, there is evidence that the perceptual representation spaces learned by current DNNs already closely resemble those of the human visual system, meaning their corresponding “quality spaces” might already be substantially aligned.”

    From Consciousness in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Science of Consciousness (2023) · cites this paper as Kriegeskorte (2015)

    In “Early Studies Testing Deep Neural Nets as Models of Biological Brain Representations,” the paper says neural networks learn representations very similar to those of the primate ventral visual pathway, including human visual-cortex representations. It does not address whether the corresponding “quality spaces” are aligned; that is an additional inference in the citing sentence. Page numbers are not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Deep-learning algorithms share organizational overlap with the ventral visual stream of the brain.

    “and share organizational overlap with the ventral visual stream of the brain [144-146].”

    From How Do Expectations Shape Perception? (2018) · cites this paper as [146]

  • Computational models that mimic brain information processing during perceptual, cognitive and control tasks are beginning to be developed and tested with brain and behavioral data.

    “Computational models that mimic brain information processing during perceptual, cognitive and control tasks are beginning to be developed and tested with brain and behavioral data.”

    From Cognitive computational neuroscience (2018) · cites this paper as [37]

  • Computational neuroscience has begun to test complex computational models that can explain high-level sensory and cognitive brain representations.

    “Computational neuroscience has also begun to test complex computational models that can explain high-level sensory and cognitive brain representations37,38.”

    From Cognitive computational neuroscience (2018) · cites this paper as [37]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Baixas, Fr.: ISCA
  2. Hochreiter S. 1991. Untersuchungen zu dynamischen neuronalen Netzen. Master's Thesis, Inst. Inform., Tech.
  3. Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton GE. 2012. ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 25:1097-105
  4. Rumelhart DE, McClelland JL, PDP Research Group. 1988. In Parallel Distributed Processing Vol. 1, pp. 354- 62. New York: IEEE
  5. Tang H, Buia C, Madsen J, Anderson WS, Kreiman G. 2014. A role for recurrent processing in object com- pletion: neurophysiological, psychophysical and computational evidence. arXiv:1409.2942 [q-bio.NC] · arXiv
  6. von Helmholtz H. 1866. Handbuch der physiologischen Optik: Mit 213 in den Text eingedruckten Holzschnitten und 11 Tafeln, Vol. 9. Voss Wallis G, Rolls ET. 1997. A model of invariant object recognition in the visual system. Prog. Neurobiol. 51:167-94

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kriegeskorte, N.
Affiliations
MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (GB)
Corresponding author
Kriegeskorte, Nikolaus
Venue
Annual Review of Vision Science
Published
2015-11-24
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
417-446
ISSN
  • 2374-4642 (ISSN-L)
  • 2374-4650
OpenAlex
W2176287621
Cited by
1,093
References
112
Citations by year
2026: 77 · 2025: 125 · 2024: 124 · 2023: 125 · 2022: 117 · 2021: 125 · 2020: 132 · 2019: 109 · 2018: 76 · 2017: 69 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 2
FWCI
10.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annual Review of Vision Science (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (WT091540MA)
  • Medical Research Council (MC-A060- 5PR20, ERC-2010-StG 261352)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
Keywords
deep neural network, biological vision, brain information processing, convolutional neural networks, representational similarity, internal representations, recurrent neural networks, computational neuroscience, visual recognition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review