Cited by 343Visual perception and processing mechanismsNeural dynamics and brain functionMemory Processes and Influences

Distributed patterns of activity in sensory cortex reflect the precision of multiple items maintained in visual short-term memory

Open access
Emrich, Stephen M., Riggall, Adam C., LaRocque, Joshua J., Postle, Bradley R.·2013·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Traditionally, load sensitivity of sustained, elevated activity has been taken as an index of storage for a limited number of items in visual short-term memory (VSTM). Recently, studies have demonstrated that the contents of a single item held in VSTM can be decoded from early visual cortex, despite the fact that these areas do not exhibit elevated, sustained activity. It is unknown, however, whether the patterns of neural activity decoded from sensory cortex change as a function of load, as one would expect from a region storing multiple representations. Here, we use multivoxel pattern analysis to examine the neural representations of VSTM in humans across multiple memory loads. In an important extension of previous findings, our results demonstrate that the contents of VSTM can be decoded from areas that exhibit a transient response to visual stimuli, but not from regions that exhibit elevated, sustained load-sensitive delay-period activity. Moreover, the neural information present in these transiently activated areas decreases significantly with increasing load, indicating load sensitivity of the patterns of activity that support VSTM maintenance. Importantly, the decrease in classification performance as a function of load is correlated with within-subject changes in mnemonic resolution. These findings indicate that distributed patterns of neural activity in putatively sensory visual cortex support the representation and precision of information in VSTM.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.5732-12.2013

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Decoding accuracy was higher for people who could more accurately form mental images during both working memory and mental imagery tasks.

    “Interestingly, decoding accuracy was higher for people who could more accurately form mental images during both tasks (WM: r = 20.51,p = 0.0053; IM: r = 20.37,p = 0.039; Figure S2), providing a strong link between mental imagery ability and the precision of population-level responses [21,22].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Emrich, S. M., Riggall, A. C., LaRocque, J. J., & Postle, B. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • University of Wisconsin System (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2013-04-10
Volume
33
Issue
15
Pages
6516-6523
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2077707797
Cited by
343
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 9
FWCI
17.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH064498)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM008692)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
visual short-term memory, memory load, early visual cortex, multi-voxel pattern analysis
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, Visual Cortex, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review