The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Death of Retinal Neurons in Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetic Mice
Abstract
PURPOSE: Neuronal cell death has been reported in retinas of humans with diabetic retinopathy and in diabetic rat models. Little is known about neuronal cell death in mouse models of diabetic retinopathy. This study was designed to determine whether neurons are lost in diabetic mouse retinas and whether the loss involves an apoptotic process. METHODS: Three-week-old C57Bl/6 mice were made diabetic with streptozotocin. They were studied over the course of 14 weeks after onset of diabetes. Eyes were processed for morphometric analysis and detection of apoptotic cells by TUNEL analysis and activated caspase-3 and were subjected to electron microscopy. RESULTS: Morphometric analysis of retinal cross sections of mice that had been diabetic 14 weeks showed approximately 20% to 25% fewer cells in the ganglion cell layer compared with age-matched control mice. There was a modest, but significant, decrease in the thickness of the whole retina and the inner and outer nuclear layers in mice that had been diabetic for 10 weeks. TUNEL analysis and detection of active caspase-3 revealed that cells of the ganglion cell layer were dying by apoptosis. Electron microscopic analysis detected morphologic features characteristic of apoptosis, including margination of chromatin and crenated nuclei of cells in the ganglion cell layer. CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that in diabetic mouse retinas, neurons in the ganglion cell layer die, and this death occurs through an apoptotic pathway. Diabetic mice may be appropriate and valuable models for studies of neuronal cell death in diabetes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Antonetti, D. A., Barber, A. J., Bronson, S. K., Freeman, W. M., Gardner, T. W., Jefferson, L. S., Kester, M., Kimball, S. R., Krady, J. K., LaNoue, K. F., et al. (2006) · Diabetes · doi:10.2337/db05-1635 · Cited by 746
Kur, J., Newman, E. A., & Chan-Ling, T. (2012) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2012.04.004 · Cited by 678
Cuenca, N., Fernández-Sánchez, L., Campello, L., Maneu, V., De la Villa, P., Lax, P., & Pinilla, I. (2014) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2014.07.001 · Cited by 401
Decreased Retinal Ganglion Cell Layer Thickness in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes
van Dijk, H. W., Verbraak, F. D., Kok, P. H. B., Garvin, M. K., Sonka, M., Lee, K., DeVries, J. H., Michels, R. P. J., van Velthoven, M. E. J., Schlingemann, R. O., et al. (2010) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.09-5041 · Cited by 359
Rowan, S., Jiang, S., Korem, T., Szymanski, J., Chang, M.-L., Szelog, J., Cassalman, C., Dasuri, K., McGuire, C., Nagai, R., et al. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1702302114 · Cited by 272
Metadata
- Authors
- Martin, P. M., Roon, P., Van Ells, T. K., Ganapathy, V., & Smith, S. B.
- Venue
- Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
- Published
- 2004-09-01
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 3330
- ISSN
- 0146-0404 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-5783
- OpenAlex
- W1981931963
- Cited by
- 453
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Death of Retinal Neurons in Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetic Mice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1167/iovs.04-0247
- The paper
- Martin, P. M., Roon, P., Van Ells, T. K., Ganapathy, V., & Smith, S. B. (2004). Death of Retinal Neurons in Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetic Mice. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.04-0247
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.