The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reproducibility of Retinal Nerve Fiber Thickness Measurements Using the Stratus OCT in Normal and Glaucomatous Eyes
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine the reproducibility of Stratus Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) measurements around the optic nerve in normal and glaucomatous eyes. METHODS: One eye was chosen at random from 88 normal subjects and 59 glaucomatous subjects distributed among mild, moderate, and severe glaucoma, determined by visual field testing. Subjects underwent six RNFL thickness measurements performed by a single operator over a 30-minute period with a brief rest between sessions. Three scans were taken with the high-density Standard RNFL protocol, and three were taken with the Fast RNFL protocol, alternating between scan protocols. RESULTS: Reliability, as measured by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), was calculated for the overall mean RNFL thickness and for each quadrant. The ICC for the mean Standard RNFL thickness (and lower 95% confidence interval [CI]) in normal and glaucomatous eyes was 0.97 (0.96 CI) and 0.98 (0.97 CI), respectively. The ICC for the mean Fast RNFL thickness in normal and glaucomatous eyes was 0.95 (0.93 CI) and 0.97 (0.95 CI), respectively. Quadrant ICCs ranged between 0.79 and 0.97, with the nasal quadrant being the least reproducible of all four quadrants, using either the Standard or Fast RNFL program. The test-retest variability ranged from 3.5 microm for the average RNFL thickness measurements in normal eyes to 13.8 microm for the nasal quadrant measurements in glaucomatous eyes, which appeared to be the most variable. CONCLUSIONS: Reproducibility of RNFL measurements using the Stratus OCT is excellent in normal and glaucomatous eyes. The nasal quadrant appears to be the most variable measurement. Standard RNFL and Fast RNFL scans are equally reproducible and yield comparable measurements. These findings have implications for the diagnosis of glaucoma and glaucomatous progression.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions
Fleiss, J. L., Levin, B., & Paik, M. C. (2003) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471445428 · Cited by 18,646
Huang, D., Swanson, E. A., Lin, C. P., Schuman, J. S., Stinson, W. G., Chang, W., Hee, M. R., Flotte, T., Gregory, K., Puliafito, C. A., et al. (1991) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1957169 · Cited by 13,788
Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, 2nd ed
GROVE, W. A. (1981) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.138.12.1644-a · Cited by 3,748
Kass, M. A. (2002) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.120.6.701 · Cited by 3,705
Weinreb, R. N., & Khaw, P. T. (2004) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(04)16257-0 · Cited by 2,222
Quigley, H. A. (1982) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.1982.01030030137016 · Cited by 1,177
Reproducibility of Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Measurements Using Optical Coherence Tomography
Schuman, J. S., Pedut-Kloizman, T., Hertzmark, E., Hee, M. R., Wilkins, J. R., Coker, J. G., Puliafito, C. A., Fujimoto, J. G., & Swanson, E. A. (1996) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(96)30410-7 · Cited by 665
Paunescu, L. A., Schuman, J. S., Price, L. L., Stark, P. C., Beaton, S., Ishikawa, H., Wollstein, G., & Fujimoto, J. G. (2004) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.03-0514 · Cited by 536
The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study
Kass, M. A. (1994) · Journal of Glaucoma · doi:10.1097/00061198-199400320-00001 · Cited by 368
Blumenthal, E. Z., Williams, J. M., Weinreb, R. N., Girkin, C. A., Berry, C. C., & Zangwill, L. M. (2000) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(00)00341-9 · Cited by 316
Cited by
Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Imaging with Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography
Leung, C. K.-S., Cheung, C. Y.-L., Weinreb, R. N., Qiu, Q., Liu, S., Li, H., Xu, G., Fan, N., Huang, L., Pang, C.-P., et al. (2009) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.04.013 · Cited by 486
Longitudinal study of vision and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in multiple sclerosis
Talman, L. S., Bisker, E. R., Sackel, D. J., Long, D. A., Galetta, K. M., Ratchford, J. N., Lile, D. J., Farrell, S. K., Loguidice, M. J., Remington, G., et al. (2010) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.22005 · Cited by 366
Metadata
- Authors
- Budenz, D. L., Chang, R. T., Huang, X., Knighton, R. W., & Tielsch, J. M.
- Venue
- Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
- Published
- 2005-07-01
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2440
- ISSN
- 0146-0404 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-5783
- OpenAlex
- W2043777090
- Cited by
- 289
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 16.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reproducibility of Retinal Nerve Fiber Thickness Measurements Using the Stratus OCT in Normal and Glaucomatous Eyes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1167/iovs.04-1174
- The paper
- Budenz, D. L., Chang, R. T., Huang, X., Knighton, R. W., & Tielsch, J. M. (2005). Reproducibility of Retinal Nerve Fiber Thickness Measurements Using the Stratus OCT in Normal and Glaucomatous Eyes. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.04-1174
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.