Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 366

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Longitudinal study of vision and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in multiple sclerosis

Open access
Talman, Lauren S., Bisker, Esther R., Sackel, David J., Long, David A., Galetta, Kristin M., Ratchford, John N., Lile, Deacon J., Farrell, Sheena K., Loguidice, Michael J., Remington, Gina, Conger, Amy, Frohman, Teresa C., Jacobs, Dina A., Markowitz, Clyde E., Cutter, Gary R., Ying, Gui‐Shuang, Dai, Yang, Maguire, Maureen G., Galetta, Steven L., Frohman, Elliot M., Calabresi, Peter A., Balcer, Laura J.·2010·Annals of Neurology

Abstract

Objective: Cross‐sectional studies of optical coherence tomography (OCT) show that retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness is reduced in multiple sclerosis (MS) and correlates with visual function. We determined how longitudinal changes in RNFL thickness relate to visual loss. We also examined patterns of RNFL thinning over time in MS eyes with and without a prior history of acute optic neuritis (ON). Methods: Patients underwent OCT measurement of RNFL thickness at baseline and at 6‐month intervals during a mean follow‐up of 18 months at 3 centers. Low‐contrast letter acuity (2.5%, 1.25% contrast) and visual acuity (VA) were assessed. Results: Among 299 patients (593 eyes) with ≥6 months follow‐up, eyes with visual loss showed greater RNFL thinning compared to eyes with stable vision (low‐contrast acuity, 2.5%: p < 0.001; VA: p = 0.005). RNFL thinning increased over time, with average losses of 2.9μm at 2 to 3 years and 6.1μm at 3 to 4.5 years (p < 0.001 vs 0.5–1‐year follow‐up interval). These patterns were observed for eyes with or without prior history of ON. Proportions of eyes with RNFL loss greater than test‐retest variability (≥6.6μm) increased from 11% at 0 to 1 year to 44% at 3 to 4.5 years (p < 0.001). Interpretation: Progressive RNFL thinning occurs as a function of time in some patients with MS, even in the absence of ON, and is associated with clinically significant visual loss. These findings are consistent with subclinical axonal loss in the anterior visual pathway in MS, and support the use of OCT and low‐contrast acuity as methods to evaluate the effectiveness of putative neuroprotection protocols. ANN NEUROL 2010;67:749–760

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.22005

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 44 references

Cited by

See all 366

Metadata

Authors
Talman, L. S., Bisker, E. R., Sackel, D. J., Long, D. A., Galetta, K. M., Ratchford, J. N., Lile, D. J., Farrell, S. K., Loguidice, M. J., Remington, G., Conger, A., Frohman, T. C., Jacobs, D. A., Markowitz, C. E., Cutter, G. R., Ying, G., Dai, Y., Maguire, M. G., Galetta, S. L., Frohman, E. M., Calabresi, P. A., & Balcer, L. J.
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-05-25
Volume
67
Issue
6
Pages
749-760
ISSN
  • 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8249
OpenAlex
W1940014806
Cited by
366
References
44
FWCI
21.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Longitudinal study of vision and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in multiple sclerosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ana.22005
The paper
Talman, L. S., Bisker, E. R., Sackel, D. J., Long, D. A., Galetta, K. M., Ratchford, J. N., Lile, D. J., Farrell, S. K., Loguidice, M. J., Remington, G., Conger, A., Frohman, T. C., Jacobs, D. A., Markowitz, C. E., Cutter, G. R., Ying, G., Dai, Y., Maguire, M. G., Galetta, S. L., . . . Balcer, L. J. (2010). Longitudinal study of vision and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in multiple sclerosis. Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.22005

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.