The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Loss of Cholinergic and Dopaminergic Amacrine Cells in Streptozotocin-Diabetic Rat and Ins2Akita-Diabetic Mouse Retinas
Abstract
PURPOSE: To identify amacrine cells that are vulnerable to degeneration during the early stages of diabetes. METHODS: Whole retinas from streptozotocin (STZ)-diabetic rats and Ins2(Akita) mice were fixed in paraformaldehyde. Apoptotic cells in the retina were quantified using terminal dUTP nick-end labeling (TUNEL) and active caspase-3 (CM-1) immunohistochemistry. Immunohistochemical markers for choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) and tyrosine hyroxylase (TH) were also used to quantify populations of amacrine cells in the Ins2Akita mouse retinas. RESULTS: The number of TUNEL-positive nuclei increased from 29+/-4 in controls to 72+/-9 in the STZ-diabetic rat retinas after only 2 weeks of diabetes. In rats, CM-1-immunoreactive (IR) cells were found primarily in the inner nuclear and ganglion cell layers after 2, 8, and 16 weeks of diabetes. At each end point, the number of CM-1-IR cells in the retina was elevated by diabetes. Approximately 2% to 6% of the CM-1-IR cells in the inner nuclear layer (INL) were double-labeled for TH immunoreactivity. After 6 months of diabetes in the Ins2Akita mouse, the morphology of the labeled ChAT-IR and TH-IR amacrine cell somas and dendrites appeared normal. A quantitative analysis revealed a 20% decrease in the number of cholinergic and a 16% decrease in dopaminergic amacrine cells in the diabetic mouse retinas, compared with the nondiabetic control. CONCLUSIONS: Dopaminergic and cholinergic amacrine cells are lost during the early stages of retinal neuropathy in diabetes. Loss of these neurons may play a critical role in the development of visual deficits in diabetes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Retinal nerve fiber layer thinning in Parkinson disease
Inzelberg, R., Ramirez, J. A., Nisipeanu, P., & Ophir, A. (2004) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2004.06.009 · Cited by 343
Cited by
Retinal ganglion cells in diabetes
Kern, T. S., & Barber, A. J. (2008) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2008.156695 · Cited by 422
Self-citationCuenca, N., Fernández-Sánchez, L., Campello, L., Maneu, V., De la Villa, P., Lax, P., & Pinilla, I. (2014) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2014.07.001 · Cited by 401
Decreased Retinal Ganglion Cell Layer Thickness in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes
van Dijk, H. W., Verbraak, F. D., Kok, P. H. B., Garvin, M. K., Sonka, M., Lee, K., DeVries, J. H., Michels, R. P. J., van Velthoven, M. E. J., Schlingemann, R. O., et al. (2010) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.09-5041 · Cited by 359
Neuroprotective strategies for retinal disease
Pardue, M. T., & Allen, R. S. (2018) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2018.02.002 · Cited by 237
Metadata
- Authors
- Gastinger, M. J., Singh, R. S. J., & Barber, A. J.
- Venue
- Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
- Published
- 2006-07-01
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 3143
- ISSN
- 0146-0404 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-5783
- OpenAlex
- W2047746047
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.