The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Human Chorioretinal Layer Thicknesses Measured in Macula-wide, High-Resolution Histologic Sections
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE: To provide a comprehensive description of chorioretinal layer thicknesses in the normal human macula, including two-layer pairs that can produce a combined signal in some optical coherence tomography (OCT) devices (ganglion cell [GCL] and inner plexiform [IPL] layers and outer plexiform [OPL] and outer nuclear [ONL] layers). METHODS: In 0.8-μm-thick, macula-wide sections through the foveola of 18 donors (age range, 40-92 years), 21 layers were measured at 25 locations by a trained observer and validated by a second observer. Tissue volume changes were assessed by comparing total retinal thickness in ex vivo OCT and in sections. RESULTS: Median tissue shrinkage was 14.5% overall and 29% in the fovea. Histologic laminar boundaries resembled those in SD-OCT scans, but the shapes of the foveolar OPL and ONL differed. Histologic GCL, IPL, and OPLHenle were thickest at 0.8. to 1, 1.5, and 0.4 mm eccentricity, respectively. ONL was thickest in an inward bulge at the foveal center. At 1 mm eccentricity, GCL, INL, and OPLHenle represented 17.3% to 21.1%, 18.0% to 18.5%, and 14.2% to 16.6% of total retinal thickness, respectively. In donors ≥ 70 years of age, the RPE and choroid were 17.1% and 29.6% thinner and OPLHenle was 20.8% thicker than in donors <70 years. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the first graphic representation and thickness database of chorioretinal layers in normal macula were generated. Newer OCT systems can separate GCL from IPL and OPLHenle from ONL, with good agreement for the proportion of retinal thickness occupied by OPLHenle in OCT and histology. The thickening of OPLHenle in older eyes may reflect Müller cell hypertrophy associated with rod loss.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
Martin Bland, J., & Altman, D. (1986) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90837-8 · Cited by 47,965
Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement
Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (2010) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.10.001 · Cited by 5,220
Ultrahigh-resolution ophthalmic optical coherence tomography
Drexler, W., Morgner, U., Ghanta, R. K., Kärtner, F. X., Schuman, J. S., & Fujimoto, J. G. (2001) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/86589 · Cited by 962
Ageing and degeneration in the macular region: A clinico-pathological study
Sarks, S. H. (1976) · British Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1136/bjo.60.5.324 · Cited by 891
Malek, G., Li, C.-M., Guidry, C., Medeiros, N. E., & Curcio, C. A. (2003) · The American Journal of Pathology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9440(10)63836-9 · Cited by 270
Self-citation
Cited by
Glaucomatous damage of the macula
Hood, D. C., Raza, A. S., de Moraes, C. G. V., Liebmann, J. M., & Ritch, R. (2013) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2012.08.003 · Cited by 867
Curcio, C. A., Messinger, J. D., Sloan, K. R., McGwin, G., Medeiros, N. E., & Spaide, R. F. (2013) · Retina · doi:10.1097/iae.0b013e31827e25e0 · Cited by 384
Self-citationFarsiu, S., Chiu, S. J., O'Connell, R. V., Folgar, F. A., Yuan, E., Izatt, J. A., & Toth, C. A. (2014) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.07.013 · Cited by 368
Mwanza, J.-C., Durbin, M. K., Budenz, D. L., Girkin, C. A., Leung, C. K., Liebmann, J. M., Peace, J. H., Werner, J. S., & Wollstein, G. (2011) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.11-7896 · Cited by 275
Balaratnasingam, C., Messinger, J. D., Sloan, K. R., Yannuzzi, L. A., Freund, K. B., & Curcio, C. A. (2017) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.12.034 · Cited by 174
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Curcio, C. A., Messinger, J. D., Sloan, K. R., Mitra, A., McGwin, G., & Spaide, R. F.
- Venue
- Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
- Published
- 2011-06-02
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 3943
- ISSN
- 0146-0404 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-5783
- OpenAlex
- W2061477205
- Cited by
- 251
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 15.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.