Cited by 125Retinal Development and DisordersCRISPR and Genetic EngineeringVirus-based gene therapy research

AAV-mediated CRISPR/cas gene editing of retinal cells in vivo

Open access
Hung, Sandy S. C., Chrysostomou, Vicki, Li, Fan, Lim, Jeremiah K. H., Wang, Jiang-Hui, Powell, Joseph E., Tu, Leilei, Daniszewski, Maciej +8 more·2016·Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Purpose Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein (Cas) has recently been adapted to enable efficient editing of the mammalian genome, opening novel avenues for therapeutic intervention of inherited diseases. In seeking to disrupt yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) in a Thy1-YFP transgenic mouse, we assessed the feasibility of utilizing the adeno-associated virus 2 (AAV2) to deliver CRISPR/Cas for gene modification of retinal cells in vivo. Methods Single guide RNA (sgRNA) plasmids were designed to target YFP, and after in vitro validation, selected guides were cloned into a dual AAV system. One AAV2 construct was used to deliver Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9 (SpCas9), and the other delivered sgRNA against YFP or LacZ (control) in the presence of mCherry. Five weeks after intravitreal injection, retinal function was determined using electroretinography, and CRISPR/Cas-mediated gene modifications were quantified in retinal flat mounts. Results Adeno-associated virus 2-mediated in vivo delivery of SpCas9 with sgRNA targeting YFP significantly reduced the number of YFP fluorescent cells of the inner retina of our transgenic mouse model. Overall, we found an 84.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 81.8-86.9) reduction of YFP-positive cells in YFP-sgRNA-infected retinal cells compared to eyes treated with LacZ-sgRNA. Electroretinography profiling found no significant alteration in retinal function following AAV2-mediated delivery of CRIS…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1167/iovs.16-19316

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Co-transduction can also be achieved by intravitreal injection, which targets the retinal ganglion cells and inner retina, albeit at much lower efficiencies than by subretinal injections.

    “However, co-transduction can also be achieved by intravitreal injection, which targets the retinal ganglion cells and inner retina (Hung et al., 2016), albeit at much lower efficiencies than by subretinal injections.”

    From Evaluating Efficiencies of Dual AAV Approaches for Retinal Targeting (2017) · cites this paper as Hung et al., 2016

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hung, S. S. C., Chrysostomou, V., Li, F., Lim, J. K. H., Wang, J.-H., Powell, J. E., Tu, L., Daniszewski, M., Lo, C., Wong, R. C., Crowston, J. G., Pébay, A., King, A. E., Bui, B. V., Liu, G.-S., & Hewitt, A. W.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Centre for Eye Research Australia, University of Melbourne, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia 2Menzies Institute for Medical Research, School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Jinan University (CN)
  • Monash University (AU)
  • University of Tasmania (AU)
Corresponding author
Hewitt, Alex W.
Venue
Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
Published
2016-06-29
Volume
57
Issue
7
Pages
3470
ISSN
  • 0146-0404 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5783
OpenAlex
W2461468522
Cited by
125
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 3
FWCI
11.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Virus-based gene therapy research
Keywords
CRISPR/Cas9, adeno-associated virus type 2, in vivo gene editing, retinal cells, SpCas9, single guide RNA, intravitreal injection, electroretinogram, retinal function, inherited retinal disease, viral gene delivery
MeSH terms
Gene Editing, Dependovirus, Animals, Bacterial Proteins, Cells, Cultured, Electroretinography, Genetic Engineering, Luminescent Proteins, Mice, Transgenic, Plasmids, Retina, Mice, Injections, Intraocular, Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review