The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Testing the NKT cell hypothesis of human IDDM pathogenesis
Abstract
Defects in IL-4–producing CD1d-autoreactive NKT cells have been implicated in numerous Th1-mediated autoimmune diseases, including diabetes, multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, and systemic sclerosis. Particular attention has been focused on autoimmune insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) because nonobese diabetic (NOD) mice and humans with IDDM are both reported to express severe deficiencies in the frequency and Th2 functions of NKT cells. Furthermore, experimental manipulations of the NKT defect in the NOD mouse induced corresponding changes in disease. Taken together, these converging studies suggested a general role of NKT cells in natural protection against destructive autoimmunity. However, in previous reports the identification of NKT cells was based on indirect methods. We have now devised a direct, highly specific CD1d tetramer–based methodology to test whether humans with IDDM have associated NKT cell defects. Surprisingly, although we find marked and stable differences in NKT cells between individuals, our study of IDDM patients and healthy controls, including discordant twin pairs, demonstrates that NKT cell frequency and IL-4 production are conserved during the course of IDDM. These results contradict previous conclusions and refute the hypothesis that NKT cell defects underlie most autoimmune diseases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hogan, A. E., Tobin, A. M., Ahern, T., Corrigan, M. A., Gaoatswe, G., Jackson, R., O’Reilly, V., Lynch, L., Doherty, D. G., Moynagh, P. N., et al. (2011) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s00125-011-2232-3 · Cited by 191
Immune mechanisms in type 1 diabetes
Wållberg, M., & Cooke, A. (2013) · Trends in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.it.2013.08.005 · Cited by 155
Arrenberg, P., Halder, R., & Kumar, V. (2009) · Journal of Cellular Physiology · doi:10.1002/jcp.21597 · Cited by 81
Calleja, S., Vivas, S., Santiuste, M., Arias, L., Hernando, M., Nistal, E., Casqueiro, J., & Ruiz de Morales, J. G. (2011) · Digestive Diseases and Sciences · doi:10.1007/s10620-010-1534-5 · Cited by 60
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, P. T., Putnam, A., Benlagha, K., Teyton, L., Gottlieb, P. A., & Bendelac, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Investigation
- Published
- 2002-09-15
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 793-800
- ISSN
- 0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4255806046
- Cited by
- 213
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Testing the NKT cell hypothesis of human IDDM pathogenesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1172/jci0215832
- The paper
- Lee, P. T., Putnam, A., Benlagha, K., Teyton, L., Gottlieb, P. A., & Bendelac, A. (2002). Testing the NKT cell hypothesis of human IDDM pathogenesis. Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci0215832
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.