Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 158Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ResearchSystemic Sclerosis and Related DiseasesVasculitis and related conditions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Antibodies to native and denatured deoxyribonucleic acid in systemic lupus erythematosus

Open access
Arana, Roberto, Seligmann, Maxime·1967·Journal of Clinical Investigation

Abstract

The relative reactivities with native and denatured DNA of 35 lupus sera were investigated by quantitative complement fixation and precipitin studies and showed great variations. The use of purified native DNA demonstrated that, in at least 22 of these 35 sera, the anti-DNA antibodies reacted with the native form, independently of denatured contaminants. Systemic lupus sera were shown to contain three main types of DNA antibodies: those reacting only with denatured DNA, those reacting to the same extent with both forms of DNA, and those reacting preferentially with native DNA. In some instances, the latter antibodies fix complement and precipitate only with native DNA but are inhibited by the denatured form. This finding points to the importance of conformation in the antigenic structure of DNA. The simultaneous occurrence of different varieties of DNA antibodies was demonstrated in several sera. Evidence was obtained that some of these human antibodies to DNA can belong to the IgM class. Thus, DNA antibodies from systemic lupus patients differ in many respects from most of the experimentally produced antibodies capable of reacting with DNA.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci105677

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 42 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Butler, V. P., S. M. Beiser, B. F. Erlanger, S. W. Tanenbaum, S. Cohen, and A. Bendich. 1962. Pu- rine-specific antibodies which react with deoxyri- bonucleic acid (DNA). Proc. NatI. Acad. Sci. 48: 1597.
  2. Tanenbaum, S. W., and S. M. Beiser. 1963. Py- rimidine-specific antibodies which react with de- oxyribonucleic acid (DNA). Proc. NatI. Acad. Sci. 49: 662.

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Arana, R., & Seligmann, M.
Affiliations
Université Paris Cité (FR)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
1967-11-01
Volume
46
Issue
11
Pages
1867-1882
ISSN
0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1968947138
Cited by
158
References
42
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
6.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Investigation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Vasculitis and related conditions
Keywords
systemic lupus erythematosus, anti-DNA antibodies, native DNA, denatured DNA, DNA conformation, antigenic structure, IgM, complement fixation, precipitating antibodies, antibody heterogeneity
MeSH terms
Antibodies, Complement Fixation Tests, DNA, Humans, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.