Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 352

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Autonomic blockade by propranolol and atropine to study intrinsic myocardial function in man

Open access
Jose, Anthony D., Taylor, Roger R.·1969·Journal of Clinical Investigation

Abstract

Blockade of cardiac autonomic nervous activity by an intravenous injection of 0.2 mg/kg propranolol and 0.04 mg/kg atropine was used with cardiac catheterization to study intrinsic cardiac function in 47 patients with normal hearts and known graded myocardial disease. After blockade, significant hemodynamic abnormalities became apparent at rest in the majority of patients with known disease, many of whom had normal control findings. This occurred partly through a reduction in the normal range of cardiac function at rest, and partly through changes in the abnormalities associated with disease: after blockade, diseased hearts had normal stroke volumes, but beat more slowly, and had higher left ventricular filling pressures. The heart rate after blockade was fixed; this was defined as the intrinsic heart rate (IHR); it ranged from 57 to 126 beats/min in different patients. Both the IHR and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure after blockade were sensitively and quantitatively related to the severity of myocardial disease. When, after blockade, arterial pressure was raised by angiotensin, the IHR was unchanged; normal hearts maintained their stroke volume and increased stroke work; diseased hearts maintained stroke volume less well and stroke work was unchanged or fell. Abnormal ventricular responses corresponded well with abnormal ventricular function at rest. In different patients the IHR was significantly related to each available index of left ventricular function. Other studies in animals have shown that the IHR is closely related to intrinsic myocardial contractility in certain forms of experimental heart failure. An analogous relationship existing between the IHR and myocardial function in patients with heart disease is suggested as the explanation for the IHR/ventricular function relationship in this study. If so, the IHR may prove valuable as an index of myocardial function in man, since it can be measured simply and safely in clinical practice.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci106167

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 352

Metadata

Authors
Jose, A. D., & Taylor, R. R.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
1969-11-01
Volume
48
Issue
11
Pages
2019-2031
ISSN
0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2037279720
Cited by
352
References
1
FWCI
5.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Autonomic blockade by propranolol and atropine to study intrinsic myocardial function in man. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1172/jci106167
The paper
Jose, A. D., & Taylor, R. R. (1969). Autonomic blockade by propranolol and atropine to study intrinsic myocardial function in man. Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci106167

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.