Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 629

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The metabolism of low density lipoprotein in familial type II hyperlipoproteinemia

Open access
Langer, Terry, Strober, Warren, Levy, Robert I.·1972·Journal of Clinical Investigation

Abstract

The metabolism of low density lipoprotein (LDL, beta lipoprotein) was studied in 10 normal individuals and 10 patients with familial type II hyperlipoproteinemia using purified radioiodinated LDL. Over 97% of the label was bound to the protein moiety of LDL and therefore the turnover data reflect the fate and distribution of LDL-apoprotein. Comparison of the metabolic behavior of biologically screened and unscreened labeled LDL preparations in dogs as well as the analysis of the urinary excretion of radioiodide derived from labeled LDL degradation in humans indicated that no significant denaturation resulted from the isolation, purification, and labeling techniques. The plasma concentration of LDL-cholesterol in normals was 105+/-21 mg/100 ml (mean +/-1 SD) in contrast to 254+/-47 mg/100 mg in patients with type II hyperlipoproteinemia; these values corresponded to LDL-apoprotein concentrations of 63+/-13 mg/100 ml and 153+/-30 mg/100 ml, respectively. Despite these differences in concentration, the synthetic rate of LDL-apoprotein in both groups was not significantly different (14.43+/-1.75 mg/kg per day in normals vs. 15.01+/-1.71 mg/kg per day in type II) nor was there any difference in the fraction of the total exchangeable LDL which was in the intravascular space (68.4+/-4.3% vs. 73.3+/-5.2%). However, the fractional catabolic rate of LDL in normal individuals differed significantly from that of patients with type II hyperlipoproteinemia (0.462+/-0.077/day in normals vs. 0.237+/-0.044/day in type II) and correspondingly the biological half-life of LDL was significantly prolonged (3.08+/-0.35 days normals vs. 4.68+/-0.44 days in type II). These data indicate that the pathologic elevation of plasma LDL concentration in the individuals with type II hyperlipoproteinemia studied here is due to a decreased fractional rate of LDL degradation rather than to an abnormality of LDL synthesis. This defect of catabolism may be the primary defect in type II hyperlipoproteinemia or, alternatively, may be secondary to an underlying abnormality in lipid metabolism.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci106949

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 629

Metadata

Authors
Langer, T., Strober, W., & Levy, R. I.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
1972-06-01
Volume
51
Issue
6
Pages
1528-1536
ISSN
0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2002700276
Cited by
629
References
0
FWCI
49.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The metabolism of low density lipoprotein in familial type II hyperlipoproteinemia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1172/jci106949
The paper
Langer, T., Strober, W., & Levy, R. I. (1972). The metabolism of low density lipoprotein in familial type II hyperlipoproteinemia. Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci106949

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.