Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 435

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ventilation with end-expiratory pressure in acute lung disease

Open access
Falke, Konrad J., Pontoppidan, Henning, Kumar, Anil, Leith, David E., Geffin, Bennie, Laver, Myron B.·1972·Journal of Clinical Investigation

Abstract

In 10 patients with severe, acute respiratory failure we studied the effects of positive end-expiratory pressure when intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV) with inspired oxygen (F(IO2)) up to 0.5 failed to maintain arterial oxygen tension (P(aO2)) above 70 torr.Positive end-expiratory pressures (PEEP) of 0, 5, 10, and 15 cm H(2)O were applied for 30-min periods each and in random order. Blood gas exchange, lung volumes, compliance, and hemodynamics were studied at each level of PEEP. P(aO2) (F(IO2) = 1.0) rose linearly with elevation of PEEP, the mean increase being from 152 to 347 torr, or 13 torr/cm H(2)O PEEP. Mean functional residual capacity (FRC) was 1.48+/-0.78 liters at zero PEEP (i.e., IPPV) and the increase was essentially linear, reaching 2.37 liters at 15 cm H(2)O PEEP. P(aO2) and FRC showed a close correlation. Total and lung static compliance were greater during ventilation with high than with low levels of PEEP. The increase in P(aO2) correlated with the specific lung compliance. Dynamic lung compliance decreased progressively with rising levels of PEEP except for an increase with 5 and 10 cm H(2)O PEEP in patients with initial values of 0.06 liter/cm H(2)O or higher. Cardiac index fell in some patients and rose in others and there was no correlation of mean cardiac index, systemic blood pressure, or peripheral vascular resistance with level of PEEP. The most probable explanation for the effect of PEEP on P(aO2) and compliance is recruitment of gas exchange airspaces and prevention of terminal airway closure.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci107042

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Cited by

See all 435

Metadata

Authors
Falke, K. J., Pontoppidan, H., Kumar, A., Leith, D. E., Geffin, B., & Laver, M. B.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
1972-09-01
Volume
51
Issue
9
Pages
2315-2323
ISSN
0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2148493977
Cited by
435
References
9
FWCI
20.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ventilation with end-expiratory pressure in acute lung disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1172/jci107042
The paper
Falke, K. J., Pontoppidan, H., Kumar, A., Leith, D. E., Geffin, B., & Laver, M. B. (1972). Ventilation with end-expiratory pressure in acute lung disease. Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci107042

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.