The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Clinical evaluation of group A and group C meningococcal polysaccharide vaccines in infants.
Open accessAbstract
Group A and group C meningoccal polysaccharide vaccines were evaluated in infants. No significant local or systemic reactions were observed with 908 doses of vaccine given to 396 infants between 3 and 12 mo of age. The antibody response varied with the age of the infant, vaccine dose, molecular weight of vaccine, prior immunization with vaccine, and prior exposure to naturally occurring cross-reactive antigens. Only 7% of 3-mo-old infants had detectable antibody responses to primary immunization with 5-200 mug of A vaccine, presumably because of suppressive effects of high concentrations of maternal anti-A. More than 90% of 7- and 12-mo-old infants responded to A vaccine, achieving geometric mean anti-A concentrations of 0.38 and 0.98 mug/ml, respectively. The dose-response curve was flat between 10 and 200 mug of A vaccine. Geometric mean anti-A concentrations of 2.51 and 4.00 mug/ml were induced in 7- and 12-mo-old infants by booster injections of A vaccine. Approximately 90% of 3-mo-old infants had detectable antibody responses to primary immunization with C vaccine. The 100-mug dose appeared to be optimal, resulting in geometric mean anti-C concentrations of 0.49, 1.55, and 2.64 mug/ml in 3-, 7-, and 12-mo-old infants, respectively. Significant booster responses were not observed with C vaccine. Indeed, except for the 10-mug dose, booster injections of C vaccine in 7- and 12-mo-old infants resulted in lower anti-C concentrations than did primary immunizations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Epidemic meningitis, meningococcaemia, and Neisseria meningitidis
Stephens, D. S., Greenwood, B., & Brandtzaeg, P. (2007) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61016-2 · Cited by 978
Siber, G. R., Schur, P. H., Aisenberg, A. C., Weitzman, S. A., & Schiffman, G. (1980) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198007243030402 · Cited by 473
Meningococcal meningitis in Africa
Greenwood, B. (1999) · Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · doi:10.1016/s0035-9203(99)90106-2 · Cited by 358
Peltola, H., Mäkelä, P. H., Käyhty, H., Jousimies, H., Herva, E., Hällström, K., Sivonen, A., Renkonen, O.-V., Pettay, O., Karanko, V., et al. (1977) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm197709292971302 · Cited by 344
Innovative Vaccine Strategy: Self-Adjuvanting Conjugate Vaccines
Manabe, Y., & Fukase, K. (2023) · Methods in Molecular Biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-2910-9_5 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Gold, R., Lepow, M. L., Goldschneider, I., Draper, T. L., & Gotschlich, E. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Investigation
- Published
- 1975-12-01
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1536-1547
- ISSN
- 0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2020972880
- Cited by
- 235
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical evaluation of group A and group C meningococcal polysaccharide vaccines in infants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1172/jci108235
- The paper
- Gold, R., Lepow, M. L., Goldschneider, I., Draper, T. L., & Gotschlich, E. C. (1975). Clinical evaluation of group A and group C meningococcal polysaccharide vaccines in infants. Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci108235
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.